Phillips O-Zone

jdizz1986

New Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2011
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Heyy, anyone tried these, was recommended by a friend of mine, they work really well!

Well worth the investment!
 
It's just unnecessary on a freshwater set up regardless of the 'benefits' all of the things Ozone does can be done by bacteria in the water column.

It smells horrible too.
 
I think its quite neat! It'll be going in my next tank for sure!

And doesnt smell :/
 
I'm not sure how these units work but when an Ozone generator was used where I used to work the smell wasn't pleasant. It similar to a UV steriliser in the job it does, but it functions in a different way.
 
Can't say I'd trust anything which claims that by using it there's no need to change the water more than once every 150 days! For goodness sake.
 
Hmmm...I notice it doesn't seem to get rid of nitrate, so you'd be just as well sticking with a conventional filter.

As for not water changing for 150 days, pffttt; even if you didnt need to change water because of the nitrate, you'd still need to change water to replenish all the trace minerals etc that your plants and fish would use up.

Nothing but a gimmick, IMO.
 
Fluttermoth is right, nothing but a gimmick, unless someone can throw some scientific evidence in the mix?
 
In the 'scientific' leaflet, which presents some wrong equations, it claims that Carbon causes algae :rolleyes:
 
planning to buy a Ozonizer (£24) to see it myself..


anyone ever used one in a fresh water?
 
As an eBay Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Wow, what a friendly bunch you are!
lol; we're not being unfriendly to you, mate!

It's just that most of us have seen loads of different gadgets and potions that claim this or that over our years of fishkeeping.

Nearly every single one has failed to prove itself over time, and nothing has yet beaten a properly cycled filter, coupled with large, regular water changes using a dechlorinator (now there's a potion I'm eternally grateful for!).
 
In the 'scientific' leaflet, which presents some wrong equations, it claims that Carbon causes algae :rolleyes:

does it not, to a certain extent? harvesting carbon it the reason for photosynthesis.
its know algae blooms, in the sea. are caused by excess CO2.


lol, as to the gadget. its another like always on UV. nothing like as effective as claimed.
 
Carbon isn't Carbon Dioxide though...It claims that the two Oxygen atoms released from the two Ozone molecules decaying will bond with Carbon to form Carbon Dioxide, which using your theory will benefit algal growth, but Carbon Dioxide doesn't cause algae, it sustains it as photosynthesis can occur.
 

Most reactions

Back
Top