bitteraspects
Fish Herder
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2009
- Messages
- 1,102
- Reaction score
- 0
Hey
Yeah, nice list let me know how it goes, think ours 150g needs restocking soon, changing alot of the stocking round as it is.
that sounds like a awesome stocking .... am very jealous... btw
love to see the look on the LFS when u ask for that much stock.. lol
Haha well I won't be purchasing that bundle all at once (I'm sure the salesclerk would have a heart attack) but they'll probably be really amused to see me come in every week for months to come.
6 Boesemani rainbowfish
20 Zebra danio
20 Harlequin rasbora
10 Swordtails
4 Keyhole Cichlids
4 Blue Rams
30 Cardinal Tetra
15 Diamond Tetra
5 Pearl Gourami
8 clown loach
20+ cories
Think is you need some kind of algae eaters, a group of 5 or so bristlenoses, or a big shoal of otto's (theyre also a schooling fish and look great in big numbers)
maybe even look at buying a shed laod of cherry shrimp. i think that tbh if you have enough in the first palce. they should breed well and produce enough offpsring as to not got all eaten, especially if the tank is full of plants.
you could also add a few more rams, maybe a coupla more keyholes's
thanks.
why would you "need" algae eaters?
let alone a large group?
they create more waste then the help the tank. i wouldnt bother.
if youre that concerned with algae, get 1 common pleco
In regards to the common pleco, I'm afraid their potential adult size sort of scares me off! Although I've heard they're fantastic fish. I was thinking about the bioload due to the bristlenoses...hmm...is it really worth it? Maybe I should just settle for more kuhli's...or increase the cardinal shoal?
you said its a 180g right? that will house a common pleco. however, nothing is better for algae then good ol elbow grease and WC. plecos will just add to your bioload. not to mention, tons of stringy poop on the bottom of the tank, just looks gross.
id definitely suggest increasing the numbers on one of the other groups
same could be said with other fish though. in general all fish produce waste so why bother with any of them.
some people may just like plecs because of the way they look... not because of what there for.
but anyway you have a good point. there probaly wouldnt be any algae in the tank anyway... so if the reason for having the plecs is to control algae then i wouldnt bother either as they do produce alot of waste.
plecos produce more detrius then just about any other fish. and when youre talking about a group,
and when it comes to plecos, most people dont keep BN for their "looks". they keep royal, or zebras. people keep BN because they eat algae and dont grow as big as common plecos.
Oh, dear. A humongous bioload is the last thing I want, although I do enjoy a heavily (but not over) stocked tank. That why I like sticking to the little guys. I have Arowana & Pacu dreams, but they're right alongside my buying-the-ocean dreams and so perhaps they'll have to be put on hold for awhile...a very long while. So without the bristlenoses, do you think I should just add more kuhli's instead? Or make one of the other shoals a bit bigger?
im sticking with more clowns personallu. lol. but thats just me. its really your decision. cardinals will have less of an impact on the water parameters the the khulis. not by much, but less.