endparenthesis
Fish Herder
I'm probably going to get some flak for this, but I think this would be a useful article for a lot of fish owners to read (I was going to add it to the euthanasia sticky, but it was closed).
http/www.cotrout.org/do_fish_feel_pain.htm
I'm posting this because I've noticed a lot of people here go through a great deal of heartache when their fish are hurt or sick. We don't want them to be hurt or sick, of course, but I think anthropomorphizing the fish makes the whole ordeal much harder on you than it needs to be.
This quote sums it all up pretty well:
REACTIONS TO INJURY ARE PRESENT IN ALL FORMS OF ANIMAL LIFE BUT THESE REACTIONS DO NOT MEAN THAT PAIN IS EXPERIENCED-IT IS NOT NECESSARY FOR A NOCICEPTIVE STIMULUS TO BE CONSCIOUSLY EXEPERIENCED FOR A BEHAVIORAL REACTION TO OCCUR
The basic premise of the article (because I doubt many will bother clicking) is that "lower" lifeforms, especially cold-blooded ones, don't need to experience pain in the traumatizing form that humans do.
Creatures that act on instinct will automatically obey the impulse to escape something that does them harm. In their case, "pain" doesn't need to be anything more than a repelling force. Something does them harm and their brain sends them moving in the other direction. No trauma required. Chances are the resulting avoidance isn't even a conscious act.
The fact that human beings can override their instincts means that pain needs to create trauma to ensure our survival. We would allow a great deal more harm to come to us if we experienced pain simply as a very strong impulse to avoid someone or something. It becomes a complex conscious experience that is unique to the more intelligent end of the spectrum of animal life.
That's a simplified version of the message the article is trying to communicate.
You don't need to put yourself in a fish's place when it's hurt or sick... you don't need to torture yourself over what you imagine it to be feeling. The similarities you may think exist between your experiences of pain simply aren't there. It isn't as horrific for them as you may believe it to be.
So I say this in the interest of alleviating some heartache. Nothing more.
It's a nice thought to picture them as little aquatic people... but wishing doesn't make it so. I personally like keeping fish because they're different from me... not because they're the same. I like observing how differently other creatures experience the world.
And, unfortunately in this world this has to be added... if you think this somehow makes it "ok" to abuse a fish or some other creature... well, it isn't hard to see who the "lower" lifeform is there.
http/www.cotrout.org/do_fish_feel_pain.htm
I'm posting this because I've noticed a lot of people here go through a great deal of heartache when their fish are hurt or sick. We don't want them to be hurt or sick, of course, but I think anthropomorphizing the fish makes the whole ordeal much harder on you than it needs to be.
This quote sums it all up pretty well:
REACTIONS TO INJURY ARE PRESENT IN ALL FORMS OF ANIMAL LIFE BUT THESE REACTIONS DO NOT MEAN THAT PAIN IS EXPERIENCED-IT IS NOT NECESSARY FOR A NOCICEPTIVE STIMULUS TO BE CONSCIOUSLY EXEPERIENCED FOR A BEHAVIORAL REACTION TO OCCUR
The basic premise of the article (because I doubt many will bother clicking) is that "lower" lifeforms, especially cold-blooded ones, don't need to experience pain in the traumatizing form that humans do.
Creatures that act on instinct will automatically obey the impulse to escape something that does them harm. In their case, "pain" doesn't need to be anything more than a repelling force. Something does them harm and their brain sends them moving in the other direction. No trauma required. Chances are the resulting avoidance isn't even a conscious act.
The fact that human beings can override their instincts means that pain needs to create trauma to ensure our survival. We would allow a great deal more harm to come to us if we experienced pain simply as a very strong impulse to avoid someone or something. It becomes a complex conscious experience that is unique to the more intelligent end of the spectrum of animal life.
That's a simplified version of the message the article is trying to communicate.
You don't need to put yourself in a fish's place when it's hurt or sick... you don't need to torture yourself over what you imagine it to be feeling. The similarities you may think exist between your experiences of pain simply aren't there. It isn't as horrific for them as you may believe it to be.
So I say this in the interest of alleviating some heartache. Nothing more.
It's a nice thought to picture them as little aquatic people... but wishing doesn't make it so. I personally like keeping fish because they're different from me... not because they're the same. I like observing how differently other creatures experience the world.
And, unfortunately in this world this has to be added... if you think this somehow makes it "ok" to abuse a fish or some other creature... well, it isn't hard to see who the "lower" lifeform is there.