Yes indeed for sure ! Tadpoles going from tadpole to frog is the coolest thing in aquadom . The first time I saw it was in grade school when a teacher set up an aquarium with tadpoles and they turned into frogs .Always found the transformation from tadpole to frog fascinating.
My biggest kick was when the tail started shrinking and legs started to form.Yes indeed for sure ! Tadpoles going from tadpole to frog is the coolest thing in aquadom . The first time I saw it was in grade school when a teacher set up an aquarium with tadpoles and they turned into frogs .
I'll let 'em hang around. See how well they do. Hadn't done something like this in ages! the more bugs eaten around here, the better!So cool! Is it for your pond outside? Do you cage them in once they convert to frogs or will they just hang around the water naturally?
Of course a tadpole is an early stage of amphibian development that ends up as a frog. Yet I have a question,. Take when I was a kid and raised tadpoles until hey became frogs and then released. Was I not really hindering nature? Let's face the fact that most of the tadpoles I raised and released would not have survived in a natural setting as they are food. Was I not actually hampering the species by putting those that would not likely have survived and letting them live. A large part of nature is survival of the fittest where the most able survive to make the next generation. I bypassed this system and, I think, likely weakened the species by putting such back in the pond.I'll let 'em hang around. See how well they do. Hadn't done something like this in ages! the more bugs eaten around here, the better!![]()
Wow Jay ! There’s a thought ! In the great and grand scheme of things maybe you did upset something or maybe you didn’t . This is a good example of why we shouldn’t mess around with nature . The result may not be known for years .Of course a tadpole is an early stage of amphibian development that ends up as a frog. Yet I have a question,. Take when I was a kid and raised tadpoles until hey became frogs and then released. Was I not really hindering nature? Let's face the fact that most of the tadpoles I raised and released would not have survived in a natural setting as they are food. Was I not actually hampering the species by putting those that would not likely have survived and letting them live. A large part of nature is survival of the fittest where the most able survive to make the next generation. I bypassed this system and, I think, likely weakened the species by putting such back in the pond.
Of course a tadpole is an early stage of amphibian development that ends up as a frog. Yet I have a question,. Take when I was a kid and raised tadpoles until hey became frogs and then released. Was I not really hindering nature? Let's face the fact that most of the tadpoles I raised and released would not have survived in a natural setting as they are food. Was I not actually hampering the species by putting those that would not likely have survived and letting them live. A large part of nature is survival of the fittest where the most able survive to make the next generation. I bypassed this system and, I think, likely weakened the species by putting such back in the pond.
I didn't mean to imply that you were doing wrong. It was just a passing thought.Well, ...maybe. I'm adding a species to a new location they may not adapt to, for admittedly selfish reasons, so some will inevitably die off(Road, predators, etc). But compared to the big corporations, logging, drilling and the like,
I'd like to think I'm doing more good than harm.