As Dr Honkerface said, the simple numeric average of watts per gallon is simple to derive for almost any situation. The problem that you run into is that much of the data was found using T-12 fixtures over a 4 ft long tank. Any other configuration needs to be adjusted for the light equivalence of this situation. The simple fact is that the T-8 and T-5 bulbs produce more useful light than a T-12 so the ratings are skewed by that. Furthermore, a light source of 50W over a 4 ft tank that is 2 ft deep and the same light source over a 2 ft long tank that is 4 ft deep do not provide the same amount of light to the plants. The plants don't really care how much light is wasted getting their light to them. The end result is that WPG is easy to calculate as suggested by Bignose but is not a very reliable of thinking about light for plants. A very small tank usually requires more light in terms of WPG than a larger tank would, for the very same plant. The real need is to measure how much light reaches the plant's leaves which is almost impossible to do. Instead we usually will say that a small tank takes a higher WPG value than a larger tank would for the same plant response. Some of the factors involved include light conversion efficiency of the bulb, geometry of the tank and light fixture and similar factors. Unless you are working with a T-12 bulb over a 55 gallon aquarium, the numbers are at best a rough estimate.