JenCliBee
PleC & CorY MaD
'justified' - to be honest, it isnt, it is clearly a sweeping statement on all fluvals being cr£$ is what you two are saying, unfortunately, i have seen this topic many times in this forum, and it still gets the old fluval -v- ehiem war going every time.
whilst i appreciate that some people may get one filter and love it, and another may hate it, but to come out and say they are all bad is to be fair stupid. thats like saying ok i hate a french person, therefore all french people i hate - or you didnt like a certain flavour of ice-cream, therefore all of them is bad.
i know people will stick with what they like regardless, me, well, im with the fx5 - ive had various filters before, including ehiems, however the fx5 has done a great job for me, they are not as well built as the ehiems, nor is there the range of parts - but for what i paid, i really cannot complain
i have 2 completely agree i was put off by fluvals for a long time becasue of ppl's comments just like miss wiggles and went for tetratec or eheim and had problems so thought i would try fluval and behold they worked and lasted longer than both the eheim and the tetratec both 2gether so 1 mans problems isnt enough 2 justify slagging a complete range off i will agree eheim over all would be a better filter but thats not saying that they will last any longer than any other filter on the market
2 miss wiggle if u dont want a back lash on ur comments then dont make them in the first place as been said ur a very established memeber on this forum and ppl listen 2 u more than they would with others but comments made like that is just silly in a sense becasue ppl listen 2 u its like ur forcing them 1 way or another
If the FX5 is the only Fluval you have had, I'm not supprised it's not given issues yet. It's not quite got the the 3 year mark at which IME at least, is where Fluvals typically start to fail
To avoid making a sweeping comment, the FX5 has thus far appeard to be reasonably OK for reliability, with only a few motor failures. This said, this was the case for the 04 series and 05 series at this point, and the 04's were s?#!, and the 05's are now starting to fail like flies hit by fly spray if work's customers make a representative sample. Granted, not all will die, but if the 05's go the same way as the 04's, most will... FX5, well, we'll wait and see. For the price of it, 8inary has a point, they are basically a disposable filter... You don't mind if they fail just outside warrenty, as they weren't that expencive anyway. Eheims run far longer than Fluvals, it's been shown in prictice time and again, and you save money through buying an Eheim, as you don't have to buy 3 Fluvals in the 10 yours you run the filter for, the origional will still be doing it's job if you do go Eheim
To avoid this becomming an Eheim vs Fluval war, for what it's worth, Rena are good also in my limited experience with them. Tetratec's if they carry on the way they are going should be good also, but haven't been about long enough to tell long-term realy.
All the best
Rabbut
so wot do u say 2 ppl that have had 104/5's 204/5's 304/5's and 405? like i have and had not 1 single issue with any of them