Jonchall, that is exactly what they would have you believe is a biofilter for a 45 gallon tank, which is what the 45 in the filter number stands for.
Jonchall, that is exactly what they would have you believe is a biofilter for a 45 gallon tank, which is what the 45 in the filter number stands for.
Here's the uchicago paper:Do you have a link to that WD? I am always the first to want to learn and expand my knowledge. What I have read in the past relates how the film, once it is developed, is more or less limited by its surface since all oxygen and nutrients must move through the surface. It is one reason that I have been ignoring the inflated claims by some manufacturers about their porous surfaces being manyfold the surface area of a smooth ceramic. The claims that the micropores match the size of bacteria and make more surface available means little if the bacterium lodged in that pore is still being fed by the bacteria that form a film more or less on the smooth outer surface. The net result might be a bacterium that is harder to dislodge but one that still relied on the surface film for nutrient supply, thus not adding to the total processing capability of the film. This sounds like it might be going in a different direction and be well worth learning. After all, at one time, the observed effects of large water changes on a mature tank were lots of fish deaths. Then we figured out that it was not the water change but the lack of previous water changes that caused the stress and killed the fish, what we call old tank syndrome. As in anything, the more we understand, the better we can do with our fish.