Well, I had no idea what that said so I put it into better English
A fish is not the same as a human. If I went out and killed my fish today, I might get animal abuse charges, but there is about a 0.1% chance. But lets say I go out and kill my two year old, then I could get the death sentence in many states.....Do you see my point? Fish should be treated humanely, but not everyone has to spend a billion dollars on equipment. Fish are important, but not so important. I mean some..(some not all you guys) are treating your fish like billionaires keep fish, but just because someone doesn't have the right sized tank or the right filter or the tank has not been cycled, don't get all mad at them and tell them to take them back to the lfs. Lfs are worse than almost anything (unless your keeping it in a gold fish bowl). I tried hard to get my point across but I'm not sure how good I did it, but its just my opinion so no offence to you guys and this forum is very very helpful. Thanks alot.
Riight.... If you went out and killed your fish (on purpose), not only would you be an idiotic berk but TBH also rather.... touched in the head. In a 'mad axe murderer' way. Unfourtunately we have no say in the law about who you kill and what happens for it, but I could also go out and kill people and have nothing done about it. You only get caught if theres evidence

OK, to put this in your style of thinking..... Say I was a tramp. No money, have to resort to eating out of dustbins etc. Would it be right for me to have kids when I can't afford to keep them, or should I have them anyway and watch them suffer all because I wanted kids? Umm... not in my book. A life is a life, whether its a polar bear, a gnu, a gnocerous or any other species of animal, including human. I say, if you wouldn't do it to your own species, you have no right to do it to other species. By taking the shark back to the lfs, you are giving it a chance of actually finding a good home.