andywg
Bored into leaving
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2004
- Messages
- 6,350
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 36
- Location
- Somewhere else, as I am banned...
But surely in that time frame between the cutting and the pithing, there is some pain (I know the discussion of whether fish feel pain as we know it or not is a whole story to itself) for the fish. On larger species, I'm sure this is probably the prefered method as it would pobviously be difficult to mash a 18" pleco. I guess you could actually do the pithing first and then sever the head but in that case would there really be any need for decapitation?
The destruction of the brain is to ensure death is swifter. There is unlikely to be time for pain (if they even feel it) to occur before the brain is destroyed. You can just pith the brain, but the decapitation ensures the spinal cord is severed as well.
And if one cares enough to worry about the time between decapitation and pithing then we should also discuss the problem with clove oil raised by Steelhealr in that clove oil is not shown to be an analgesic (something which knocks you out) but is an anaesthetic (something which prevents nociceptors sending signals of damage and further prevents the subject from movement).
This means that a fish killed using clove oil may well be fully aware of what is happening to its body as it dies but without the ability to do anything about it. The analogy used was that of a quadriplegic person drowning - they feel no pain but are aware of what is happening so can still suffer the stress of the situation.
Strangely enough, the American veterinary association also recommends CO2. Methods of Alka Seltzer or (for the higher tech planted people) using pressurised CO2 to kill a fish would appear suitable.








