What's new

Uk Election

MewMew42

Fish Herder
Joined
Feb 13, 2009
Messages
1,420
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Manchester UK
Is anyone voting? and who for?

I dont want this to turn into a debate, Im just curious =]

Im personally voting for the Lib Dems
 
If I could vote, I would vote either BNP or UKIP, I'm also in favour of the voting age being lowered to 14, if you have any interest in politics at that age you should have the right to vote, as what goes off in parliament affects those under the age of 18 too.
 
Voting for lib dems to win is just helping the conservatives win. Labour voters are the most likely to switch to LD so labour just end up losing seats and the conservatives win by a land slide.

Voting for BNP is just stupid.
 
Voting for lib dems to win is just helping the conservatives win. Labour voters are the most likely to switch to LD so labour just end up losing seats and the conservatives win by a land slide.

Voting for BNP is just stupid.

Why is it stupid? It may be a bit of a waste of a vote but how else are they meant to grow as a party? They need votes in order to grow, the more they're heard, the faster they'll grow.
 
It is considered stupid by many, because they are viewed as a racist party, who will never win, and don't deserve to win.

I'm not saying that is right, because everyone is entitled to an opinion, and everyone has the right to vote, and it's a personal choice,

voting age, if lowered to 14, sure, there are 14 year olds who will take on the responsibility and take it seriously, but there are also others, who will just make it a joke, and i don't think we need stupid kids somehow managing to vote pikachu into office. like i say though, yes there are some who will take it seriously, but there are probably more who wouldn't.

personally i go with Lib Dem, I whole heartedly disagree with a liberal approach to immigration, but when it's the only thing I don't agree with, compared to not agreeing with much at all of the other parties, it's a small price to pay, and even then, if any of us want to go abroad, then we shouldn't be so fussy about others coming here.
 
personally being 15 would vote pikachu if the voting age was lower
 
I think the voting age should go down to 16 as most kids have finished school, are at work full time and paying tax.

If I had registered in time, I would vote for Lib Dems.
 
i think lowering the age on the local part of the election might be a good idea, lower it to 15, so kids (or young adults? at that age???) can get used to voting, and are still in school to learn about how the system works... because the whole system is set up in a very confusing way.
 
I don't get BNP. I mean what benefits would 'White Nationalism' bring to our country? Although I do think patriotism in the country will increase.

I can understand UKIP and they're ideology.

I think 16 would be a suitable age for voting. Anything below could highly be fixed by parents and alike. Its quite alot to get your head round when your an adult never mind a child.

James.
 
I think the voting age should go down to 16 as most kids have finished school, are at work full time and paying tax.

If I had registered in time, I would vote for Lib Dems.

I never registered y'know, I just got polling cards lol

I have 2 different and im not even sure why :S

we should get taught this!
 
lol my euro teacher was just telling our class about the election you guys are having

no offense but i find it rather odd that you guys only have an election the the guy (or party? i forgot) WANTS an election

but on the other hand you wont have to suffer through 2 years of campains,just a few months

i might get extra credit if i take a percentage on who votes for what..... keep em coming people!!
 
Voting for BNP is just stupid.

Why is it stupid?

They are all but the political front of the old national front, a white supremacist organisation with some fairly unpalatable ideas. Their notable rise in recent times is the by-product of the way the Labour party dealt with the issues of immigration and Europe at the last two elections (calling anyone who disagreed either racist or xenophobic) hence why much of the BNP support is in Labour heartlands (consider the Dagenham constituency where Nick Griffin is standing). The Labour party has long supported a "no platform" approach to the BNP, with a belief that debating with them will give them undue credibility. This, combined with a lack of desire to approach the topics the BNP highlight has resulted in many people hearing a little and liking the sound of the BNP. The horrendous ganging up when Nick Griffin appeared on QT will almost certainly have roused the British support for the underdog and got more votes for his party rather than allowing a much needed spot light to be shone on the shallowness of much that he says.

The BNP are a party (albeit a perfectly legal one) which is only allowing people of non white Anglo-Saxon ethnicities to join as a result of a court order and many of their membership dream of a time when they can see "foreigners" (often including the children and grandchildren of families invited to come and live in the UK by the government in the 1960s) leaving to go back to their "home".

Put simply, most people living in the 21st century with an idea of equality and fairness should come to the conclusion that the BNP are not a good party to have in any position of power. Nick Griffin has performed a small miracle in changing the outward image to be more media friendly (and this has coincided with the aforementioned handling of the immigration and Europe issue by the Labour party) and thus they appear more likeable. The BNP is also a great protest vote as all the major parties hate them and thus you are guaranteed to upset the "established parties".

To summarise - the BNP are not what they often claim to be and are almost certainly not a nice group of people.

I never registered y'know, I just got polling cards lol

I have 2 different and im not even sure why :S

we should get taught this!

If you look at the cards I would expect you to find one is for the general election and the other will be for the local elections being held on the same day. If not then something odd has happened.

lol my euro teacher was just telling our class about the election you guys are having

no offense but i find it rather odd that you guys only have an election the the guy (or party? i forgot) WANTS an election

Then I would guess either your teacher is wrong or you have misunderstood slightly. We do not only have an election when the ruling party wishes. Each term of parliament is 5 years long and no longer, thus we are held to 5 year terms. However, the governing party has the choice of asking the Queen to dissolve Parliament at an earlier stage. This occurred in the current election; the end of 5 years was in June 2010, but it was felt that many voters would see Gordon Brown clinging on to the last as bad form and the Labour Party's finances probably would not stretch too well to fighting two nationwide elections within a month or so of each other.



On an aside, it is good to see so many young people here performing in line with the first part of Churchill's quote regarding age and political beliefs:

"Show me a young Conservative and I'll show you someone with no heart. Show me an old Liberal and I'll show you someone with no brains."

I wonder if any of you will change your minds as you get older ;)
 
I think 16 would be a suitable age for voting. Anything below could highly be fixed by parents and alike. Its quite alot to get your head round when your an adult never mind a child.

I am not a huge fan of lowering the voting age. The 18-24 age bracket is the worst performing at actually going to the booths, indicating that younger people with a keen (or perhaps even passing) interest in politics are the exception and not the norm. I add to this evidence of the fairly large amount of maturing one does in those years (both from my own experience and observing others) though this undoubtedly carries on for some time after and is not a great point to rely on in argument.

I personally would rather look at why those who can already vote choose not to before looking at further broadening those who can vote.

i dont know who to vote for so i probably wont :unsure:

That's a hard position to be in (especially as some people get really upset with those who do not vote and imply that people died on the beaches of Normandy just so you could vote). If there is no one who has grabbed your attention or that you feel you can associate with I shall try a random suggestion (rather than the horrible "read their manifestos and then decide): vote for a random party. I have always liked the Monster Raving Loony Party. Some of their previous manifesto pledges are:

  • Abolish income tax, it was only meant to be a temporary measure during the Napoleonic Wars;
  • Put Parliament on wheels to allow it to sit throughout the country, not just London;
  • Refusing to sign up to the euro, but inviting the rest of Europe to join the pound;
  • Drivers can go straight over a roundabout when there's no traffic coming "to make driving through Milton Keynes more fun";
  • Traffic cops "too stupid" for normal police work to be retrained as vicars;
  • Withdrawal of MPs' £118,000 expenses allowance, and the money "in future be distributed to the poor and needy so that they can waste it instead";
  • Any MP whose constituency sells off a school playing field for development will be required to relinquish their own back garden as a replacement sports facility for the school;
  • All motorways to become massive cycle tracks instead;
  • All speed cameras will be abolished and replaced by a new device fitted to cars which will automatically slow down to the speed limit when driven though an infra-red beam;
  • The introduction of a 99p coin to "save on change";

On a (sometimes worrying) note, three of their previous manifesto pledges have now become law (two from the current government: passports for pets and all day drinking).
 

Most reactions

Back
Top