If you take a whole lot of data, like testing everything twice a day and putting it all into a spreadsheet and graphing and then look at the entire multimonth fishless cycle, you can often see some pretty standard looking cycling curves - we have a fair number of them sitting behind links in fishless cycling threads from over the years. But its always good to remember that on a more day to day basis, graphing the stuff can be very confusing. Remember that you are dosing a big jolt of 3,4,5ppm of ammonia all at once and then this spike of ammonia goes down as the A-Bacs take each 1ppm of NH3 and convert it to 2.7ppm of NO2, roughly, and then to 3.6ppm of NO3.. so the humps in the graph should be of 3 different substances each a little bigger and coming a little later. But to see a nice little "movie" like this you'd need to go nuts taking data, perhaps all 3 tests every half hour for days on end. You'd need a machine.
In real life there are two things working against seeing nice graphic hills like this: first, we are only taking readings usually at most at the 12 and 24 hour mark after the ammonia dosing, so we could completely miss a hump going up and down, and secondly, the bacteria are life forms, not chemical reactions, so they can have literally hundreds or thousands of factors going on within their cell walls that might create delays or speedups in when things might happen (ie. they are unpredictable in practical terms, as all life forms are.)
This is why any conclusion you make about your results is a better conclusion if you mentally place it within a multiday result context.
~~waterdrop~~