Unfortunately I believe the experience with this filter is pretty marginal too. The gaps though are hard to judge. Filter design is tricky and seeing spaces in a filter does not -necessrily- mean something is wrong. On the other hand, I'd be more inclined to trust the gaps if the filter were from one of the major designers, Rena, Eheim, Fluval or Tetratec or perhaps a few others. At 95L, many hobbyists would be paying more for one section of their filter media than the entire cost of this filter, so pricewise (although never a particularly good way to judge things) it might make one suspicious. Many hobbyists would run a medium-small external cannister on a 95L, although a large HOB or internal could also handle it.
Having said all this, let me try to mention the other side of things. In the hands of a good aquarist, we've seen that small filters can work ok in a tank. Good maintenance habits (basically, performing weekly gravel-clean-water-changes with solid regularity) go a very, very long way to maintaining a healthy aquarium and is really quite as important as a decent biofilter is. Only you can know your situation, so there's a judgement call in deciding whether to give this filter a go or upgrading before you start the long cycling process.
If you decide to use it I would definately work with the members to replace the media with something we know will maximize your chances. I would probably not recommend carbon and resins taking up space that could be used for biomedia.
~~waterdrop~~