🐠 May TOTM Voting is Live! 🐠
🏆 Click here to Vote! 🏆
http/www.reefcentral.com/forums/showthre...=freshwater+dsbNow, to the original question.
While a FW DSB is possible, it is not really too feasible. Most of the sand or mud dwelling bottom fauna you need are insect larvae and well..... they metamorphose into flying bugs, lots of 'em, and in your house.
In a freshwater tank, you are basically simulating a lake or pond environment, and the bottoms of these area are often quite mucky (one of the technical terms used to describe these sediments is LSO (= Loon Sh*t Ooze - and no, I am not kidding )). We really can't duplicate this environment well in our systems.
So... bottom line go with some sediment for the plants, and I would suggest a potting soil mix, but don't use a DSB.
Greenmaji said:The Monaco or Plenium system was invented to reduse the accurance of hydrogen sulfide by keeping the dead zone in the middle of the sandbed with nylon screen protecting it from digging fish.
The high magnesium and other ionic charged minerals in the substrate is a sign of aggrogate substrate used in marine and ARLC (African Rift Lake Cichlid) tanks (this has been done on ARLC tanks by the way).
It's a modification of the DSB.. but.. It can be used in FW and brackish tanks that dont mind the added buffers from agrogate sand..
As far as the critters to consume exess nutrients go.. you can set up a flow pattern to keep debis from settling on the bottom of the tank so they can be processed by the filtration in the tank.. UGJ's (Under Gravel Jets: cichlid-forum) are designed to do just this.
I must certainly agree with the above, that fears of hydrogen sulfide are unfounded, to an extent. Although I am not using a DSB, I am experiencing quite a bit of this phenomenon with my first serious attempt at a planted tank. The lower 3-4 inches of substrate is a soil type mixture, consisting of peat and other organic materials (under ~2in of sand).steelhealr said:As Navarre stated above, invertebrates or other animals help to stir up this bed and assist in some aeration and movement of water flow. The fear of hydrogen sulfide, I think, is really unfounded and if it occurs is related to overfeeding, poor circulation and use of the wrong substrate (coarse sand or crushed coral) that will collect detritus.
[snapback]923777[/snapback]
Bignose said:So, if the substrate is anaerobic and has been delpleted of its manganese and iron, it may turn to sulfer (which is in all the foods and is typically very abundant). And note that a by-product of the reaction is hydrogen sulfide (H2S) gas that is very toxic to all living things. The really good news is that H2S is very unstable near oxygen. As soon as H2S runs into some oxygenated water it becomes sulfuric acid, which while dangerous, it nowhere near as bad as hydrogen sulfide gas:
H2S + 2 O2 --> HSO4(-) + H(+)
As a point, H2S was found to be negligible in a study of a swamp with oxygenated water, even when the sediment levels in the swamp were very high. I think that the classic danger that is warned about is H2S gas, but my understanding is that H2S is neutralized very very quickly. So you would have to have quite a lot of stagnant H2S for it to come out of the subtrate and kill something.
[snapback]922633[/snapback]