Why some L numbers are the same

FishForums.net Pet of the Month
🐶 POTM Poll is Open! 🦎 Click here to Vote! 🐰

Barry Tetra

Fish Aficionado
Pet of the Month 🎖️
Joined
Dec 23, 2019
Messages
3,366
Reaction score
1,817
Location
Thailand
For example L001 and L022 are the same species, why?
 
The two "L" numbers are the same species, Pterygoplichthys joselimaianus, according to all sources I have accessed. Here is the entry from Ferraris, "Checklist of catfishes, recent and fossil (Osteichthyes: Siluriformes), and catalogue of siluriform primary types," Zootaxa 1418 (2007).

Pterygoplichthys joselimaianus (Weber, 1991) Glyptoperichthys joselimaianus Weber, 1991: 640, illustrated in Weber (1992: 20, pl. 15b). Type locality: Rio Ara-guaya, affl. du Tocantins, système de l’Amazone, Aruanã, Goiàs, Brésil. Holotype: MZUSP 4873. Distribution: Tocantins River basin, Brazil (Weber, 2003).

The Ferraris checklist is available online for free:

Weber's description is here:
Weber, C. 1991 (Sept.) "Nouveaux taxa dans Pterygoplichthys sensu lato (Pisces, Siluriformes, Loricariidae)." Revue Suisse de Zoologie v. 98 (no. 3): 637-643. [English summary.]

Weber described this species in the genus Glyptoperichthys as Glyptoperichthys joselimaianus, and it was moveed into the current genus by Armbruster & Page (2006) in this paper:

Armbruster, J. W. and L. M. Page 2006 (27 Dec.) Redescription of Pterygoplichthys punctatus and description of a new species of Pterygoplichthys (Siluriformes: Loricariidae). Neotropical Ichthyology v. 4 (no. 4): 401-409.
which is available online here:

I have not accessed Weber's paper, and the two "L" numbers might be mentioned therein. I would suspect that it was simply a matter of two different specimens collected by different collectors being assigned an "L" number. I am sure this must often occur. When the fish is actually analysed and described (and named) as a distinct species, this would come to light.

In the case of all "L" loricariids, and also the "C" and "CW" Corydoras fish, they are "discovered" and assumed to possibly be a new species and thus assigned the number for temporary identification. Only the formal description can determine if the fish is or is not a new distinct species. Geographic differences in thee external pattern of any species may suggest it could be a distinct species, but it may or may not turn out that it is.
 

Most reactions

trending

Staff online

Back
Top