I wasnt talking about the platys or swordtails you commonly see in a shop . im talking about xiphophorous in general , basically what make for example xiph.nigrensis a swordtail not a platy for example as some that dont have a sword are known (i think) as swordtails . all gets rather confusing .
Hi Damian, this is confusing and I am not sure that I know the answer.
The obvious starting point is back in the mid 1800s when Xiphophorus and Platypoecilius genus's were erected. It was obviously confusing even then because of the three species allocated to the genus, only Xiphophorus helleri had a sword and the other species Goodea gracilis and Pseudoxiphophorus bimaculata do not have swords but the original and remaining members of the genus are Xiphophorus helleri and Platypoecilius maculatus and variatus.
In 1913 the two genus were combined and Xiphophorus (meaning Sword Bearing) was retained as it was the precedent name. It was not maintained because it was the most appropriate.
When new species have been found, they have often first been allocated as a subspecies before they are given their new name.
In the 1990s a number of groups were introduced; Northern Platyfish, Southern Platyfish and the Swordtails and then subsequently the Swordtails were allocated to various groups (Clades) of fish which were the most similar. Whenever a new species is identified, they are allocated to the Group and Clade which they are most similar to. So for instance, Xiphophorus kallmani was erected in 2003 and this was allocated to the helleri Clade.
I will try to sort out the list of which species belong to which group / clade when I get a chance over the next few days but try to remember that this classification system is completely manmade and fluid based on similarities and differences. So therefore, in the early 1900s the scientists discovered that the platies and the swords were very similar and combined the genuses and subsequently the genuses have developed by association as and when new species were introduced.
Obviously for us hobbyists, the existence or otherwise of the sword is an important factor because it is the thing we can see; but for scientists the appearance of a fish is a very small part of it's classification, the gonopodium structure, genetic code, dentition and other inconspicuous to the naked eye properties define which family, tribe, genus, group and clade a scientist places a species. Along with geographical factors.
So as Colin T said earlier in this thread, do not try and understand the differences between Swordtails and Platies, try to get used to the various species of Xiphophorus and accept which group they are placed into.