To Small For Frontosa's

[england]

 

[minxfishy]

Nice, think they might just have a little bit of room to swim

 

[england]

yea but 16 foot not really much eh, like keeping a betta in a wine glass

 

[Bebobb]

I just looked them up on the internet, and they are usually about 15" full grown. How many are in that tank? A good 10? Wow, I have seen many members on this forum with fronts in a smaller tank than that! Wow...

 

[arobinson1984]

I think nelly was being a tad sarcastic

I'm not a expert on cichlids but a quick search around a couple of sites found on google seems to suggest a minimum tank size of around the 75-100 gal mark

Andy

 

[finalfantay85]

16ft?!?!? Jeez that's a tiny tank you could easily fit another 2 or 3 tanks in

 

[holidayinn]

I wonder how thick that glass/acrylic must be...

 

[Bebobb]

I think nelly was being a tad sarcastic

I'm not a expert on cichlids but a quick search around a couple of sites found on google seems to suggest a minimum tank size of around the 75-100 gal mark

Andy

From what I read a 200 gallon is the minimum...

 

[ian]

that tank is tiny. I wouldn't even call it a nano, i would call it a micro nanocasm.

 

[MOW4T]

what a waste of a tank IMO

not that frontosas are not nice or anything, but that thing has so much stocking potential

 

[england]

hehe true, but the bloke in question was from a frontosa forum and those perticular ones cost a fair bit i beleive

 

[star4]

*sigh* oh I wish, lol

 

[Auratus]

Too bad they decorated it with clay pots how boring. Unless it's a breeding tank or something