Tattooed Fish/glo Fish

Should GloFish be banned?

  • Yes

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • No

    Votes: 1 100.0%
  • Unsure

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    1
ban all o them especially tattooed but only use the glo fish for detecting water pollutants dont lets them interbreed in the wild!(as in set some free in the wild) that could cause the entire ecosystem to collapse!!
shahrez
thats going to happen inevitably someday...mollies that shouldnt be there in australia, snakeheads in america...it goes on and one day it will collapse to some extent
 
They might be bright pink now, but it won't be long before they get OCTOCAMO!!!@!~2
 
Of course tattooed fish should be banned - think about it - they surely have to be taken out of the water and handled to do it which is stressful, its got to involve some pain and it obviously destroys the protective slime coating so the mortality rate must be horrendous! Anyone buying them cant be a fish lover. :angry:
 
It is possible that after a 1000 years the fish would evole a little bit. Maybe they will lose there fluorescence or spontanously combust. But for a fact they do need a fluorescent light to bright up.
 
It is possible that after a 1000 years the fish would evole a little bit. Maybe they will lose there fluorescence or spontanously combust. But for a fact they do need a fluorescent light to bright up.

They are alredy glo-ing without a flouresant light... the light just "enhances" their color.

but seriously, dont ban glo-fish... they rock!
 

Most reactions

Back
Top