How can you possibly know if it is unsuitable if you won't even at least see if it does work or not?
Come on and have some faith in them for crying out loud!
Does the customer have to lose fish because the filter is not up to the job before we decide if it is or isn't suitable after your suggested test ? [?
made me chuckle the fish wont die becuase you filter is rated 5 gallons less, in fact the fish, owner and even the milkman will not notice any diffrence at all should you not have looked at box
LOL, thanks for bringing some humour to a topic that is becoming heated BBA
I guess I am passionate about people getting screwed over by retailers / manufacturers. I just feel that if something is gonna be bundled together then it should all at least LOOK as though its meant to go together. Tetra made a mistake here, and however you look at whether then filter will work or not, its not a good move. They set themselves up for people to be concerned. I just don't get it. WHY put a filter that you claim is only suitable for smaller tanks into the package ? (And WHY did the shrimp girl get one packaged that is meant for tanks BIGGER, lol ?). Surely you see the frustration of it all ? Crikey, its not even my tank,
. I have no reason for really getting on a soap box over it, OTHER than because I believe if you are going to sell something, the contents should at least be suitable. Or SAY they are suitable. The filter could work fine, it probably WILL work fine. Its just why should anyone have to buy the package wondering "is it going to be fine" ? Its the whole "I bought this package but it came with a filter that SAYS its only ok for smaller tanks" thing that really hacks me off here.
One thing though, you said "should you not have looked on the box". 1. Not me, its not my tank. 2. As I already stated, if all it said on the box is "comes with a PF10 filter" with no reference to what that filter can handle other than a model number, it would be reasonable for the consumer to expect whatever the filter is to be suitably rated. People dont look at the box and see whats included and then have to question "Is whats included suitable for the main item", surely ?
Anyway, you all know where I stand on this one. In favour of the plaintiff, LOL. TETRA, sort your stuff out. If you are gonna sell packages, at least have the sense to include stuff that SAYS its suitable. To the OP, best of luck with whatever you choose to do.
I'm gonna have a beer, chill, and work out what #41#### substrate I am going to buy for my Aqua One tank (which incidentally came with an Aquis 750 filter .... now here's a funny story ... the BOX on the filter says "suitable for aquariums of 60L to 150L" MY TANK is 175L. I rang AQ1 and asked about this, and they told me that the details on the box had been printed wrong and it was in fact rated for tanks up to 200L.. Im about to sell it though as I have a Tetratec EX1200).
Oh, and to anyone who has been on the opposing team in favour of the manufacturer, I hope you know that I see debates like this in much the same way Barristers see their battles in court. Nothing personal, and once out of the courtroom and in the bar, everyone's friends again
It just all boils down to improper packaging. The fish, I'm sure, will be fine. The other thing is that most of us oldies on the forum are a bit addicted to overfiltering, so this just twanged a nerve.
Lisa, a total tangent here. What sand are you using in that cory pic in your signature ?