tetraman,
This seems like a good opportunity for you to learn some critical evaluation skills of your own. You have to learn to look at the facts yourself and decide which evidence is more credible. You also have to argue facts, not
ad hominum attacks (attacking the person not the evidence) and not just stubbornly sticking with the first thing you read.
Ad hominum arguments are just one of several examples of logical fallacies (http

/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_fallacy)
Can you cite for the people reading this thread any other evidence that salt is OK for cory catfish? Any other evidence than one book's author whose main evidence is "I did it for 40 years"? Does he cite any research papers or other books, for example?
"I did it for 40 years" is a related logical fallacy, anecdotal evidence. What works, or does not appear to cause harm, for one person does not mean it is true for everyone. This is why scientific studies involve hundreds or thousands of subjects. For example, if I said I put marinara sauce in my tanks and the fish didn't get sick, would that mean that you would too?
The people who have posted on here have cited several different sources refuting your information. Can you bring back any more information supporting your side? Frankly, if you can't, you need to at the very least agree-to-disagree.