andywg
Bored into leaving
And the peer review of that research pointed out (just as I do above) that while the research in Scotland proves that fish feel the physical side of pain (never disputed by me) at no point does the article you have linked to cover the point on fish feeling pain as an emotional aspect except to say:""I am willing to bet you haven't handled and trained that many fish, or non mammals for that matter. Remember that mammals will all contain the area of the brain in which we process pain, and therefore can quite conceivably feel pain. A fish does not have the area of the brain that deals with pain, leading to the belief that they cannot feel it "".
OK I dont wishto repeat myself, but there is physical evidence that fish do indeed feel pain, using a different part of their brain.
James Rose, a fisherman and a professor in the University of Wyoming's Department of Zoology and Physiology, wrote a scathing critique of Sneddon's findings, which appeared on the university Web site, claiming that they contained poor methodology and misinterpreted the data. The key to his objections centered around how animals perceive pain. He cited the Seattle-based International Association for the Study of Pain, which defines pain as "an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage..." And, he said, the signals sent by nociceptors are not in themselves pain.
Note the last sentance there.
As I stated before, in scientific terms, the jury is very much out.