Nitrate in tap water/well water/source water - another thought

If you choose to look up academic papers on this topic, remember the following:
There are two different ways scientists report nitrate:
  1. NO₃ (nitrate ion)
    – This is what aquarium test kits measure.
    – Units: ppm NO₃ or mg/L NO₃
    – This is the number most hobbyists talk about.
  2. NO₃-N (nitrate expressed as nitrogen only)
    – This is how many scientific papers report nitrate.
    – Units: mg/L NO₃-N
    – This is not the same as ppm NO₃.
Why?
Because NO₃ contains nitrogen AND oxygen, but NO₃-N only counts the nitrogen part of the molecule.

To convert NO₃-N → NO₃, multiply by 4.43.
NO₃ (ppm) = NO₃-N × 4.43

Example:
A study says nitrate is 10 mg/L NO₃-N.
What is that in aquarium terms?
10 × 4.43 = 44.3 ppm NO₃
So a “10 mg/L NO₃-N” study is talking about 44 ppm nitrate in aquarium language.
 
Nitrites and Nitrates are harmful to all animals, birds, fish and reptiles, even in low levels. They cause cancer in people and mammals and levels above 20ppm will kill wild caught invertebrates, which is where the maximum level of 20ppm nitrates comes from.

The World Health Organisation (WHO) has recommended no more than 50ppm nitrate be in drinking water, but ideally you want the level as low as possible and at 0ppm if you can.

There are other harmful substances that get into the drinking water including forever chemicals used in fire fighting foam. These are extremely harmful to all living things and you regularly find forever chemicals in water with nitrates, but not always. There are plenty of natural water supplies with fire fighting chemicals in but no nitrates.

If you have nitrates in your drinking water, try to find a way to filter them out for your own safety, as well as the safety of your family and pets.
Is there any paper about 20ppm that will kill wild caught fish? What kind if forever chemicals are we talking about? PFAS? In the EU regulations are in the making.

but ideally you want the level as low as possible and at 0ppm if you can.
I only could find papers that disagree with that. Nitrate is not directly carcinogenic: Nitrate occurs naturally in many vegetables and also in drinking water. In these natural sources, it is usually harmless because protective substances such as vitamin C and other antioxidants are also present, which inhibit the formation of nitrosamines.
 
Last edited:
I have a folder labelled Nitrate with papers. But, It has been a while since I looked to see what was new. Here is one example (click the link in the citation to see the full paper):

Daniel F Gomez Isaza, Rebecca L Cramp, Craig E Franklin, Simultaneous exposure to nitrate and low pH reduces the blood oxygen-carrying capacity and functional performance of a freshwater fish, Conservation Physiology, Volume 8, Issue 1, 2020, coz092, https://doi.org/10.1093/conphys/coz092

Abstract​


Human activities present aquatic species with numerous of environmental challenges, including excessive nutrient pollution (nitrate) and altered pH regimes (freshwater acidification). In isolation, elevated nitrate and acidic pH can lower the blood oxygen-carrying capacity of aquatic species and cause corresponding declines in key functional performance traits such as growth and locomotor capacity. These factors may pose considerable physiological challenges to organisms but little is known about their combined effects. To characterise the energetic and physiological consequences of simultaneous exposure to nitrate and low pH, we exposed spangled perch (Leiopotherapon unicolor) to a combination of nitrate (0, 50 or 100 mg L−1) and pH (pH 7.0 or 4.0) treatments in a factorial experimental design. Blood oxygen-carrying capacity (haemoglobin concentration, methaemoglobin concentrations and oxygen equilibrium curves), aerobic scope and functional performance traits (growth, swimming performance and post-exercise recovery) were assessed after 28 days of exposure. The oxygen-carrying capacity of fish exposed to elevated nitrate (50 and 100 mg L−1) was compromised due to reductions in haematocrit, functional haemoglobin levels and a 3-fold increase in methaemoglobin concentrations. Oxygen uptake was also impeded due to a right shift in oxygen–haemoglobin binding curves of fish exposed to nitrate and pH 4.0 simultaneously. A reduced blood oxygen-carrying capacity translated to a lowered aerobic scope, and the functional performance of fish (growth and swimming performance and increased post-exercise recovery times) was compromised by the combined effects of nitrate and low pH. These results highlight the impacts on aquatic organisms living in environments threatened by excessive nitrate and acidic pH conditions.


I have a number of papers bookmarked which deal with specific species. Here is an example but you need institutional access to read the full paper at no charge or else you have to pay to read it.

Learmonth, C. and Carvalho, A.P., 2015. Acute and chronic toxicity of nitrate to early life stages of zebrafish—setting nitrate safety levels for zebrafish rearing. Zebrafish, 12(4), pp.305-311.

Abstract​

Recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS) have been widely used for zebrafish rearing, allowing holding of many thousands of fish at high densities. Water quality in RAS largely depends on biofilters that ultimately convert the extremely toxic ammonia excreted by fish into the much less toxic nitrate. However, when water renewal is minimal in RAS, nitrate can accumulate to high enough levels to negatively impact fish welfare and performance. Therefore, the setting of safety levels of nitrate for zebrafish should be a priority to avoid unwanted effects in both the intensive production of this species and research outputs. The present study aimed to define nitrate safety levels for zebrafish based on acute and chronic toxicity bioassays in early life stages of this species. Acute bioassays revealed ontogenetic changes in response to high nitrate levels. Based on NOEC (no observed effect concentration) values, safety levels should be set at 1450, 1855, and 1075 mg/L NO3−-N to prevent acute lethal effects in embryos, newly-hatched larvae, and swim-up larvae, respectively. In the chronic bioassay, larvae were exposed to nitrate concentrations of 50, 100, 200, and 400 mg/L NO3−-N during the entire larval period (23 days). No negative effects were observed either on larval performance or condition at concentrations up to 200 mg/L NO3−-N. However, at 400 mg/L NO3−-N, survival drastically decreased and fish showed reduced growth and evidence of morphological abnormalities. Accordingly, a safety level of 200 mg/L NO3−-N is recommended during the larval rearing of zebrafish to prevent negative impacts on juvenile production.

As you can see from the above the nitrate levels are insane. They are expressed on the nitrogen scale which means you have to multiply them: NO3 = NO3-N * 4.42664

Based on "Accordingly, a safety level of 200 mg/L NO3−-N is recommended during the larval rearing of zebrafish to prevent negative impacts on juvenile production." the reading on an API kit would be 885 ppm. Of course the API test has a top reading of 160 ppm so you would have to do diluted testing. Instead of using their 5 ml level vial you would need to use over 6 times that amount of tank water, i.e. 30 ml.


So there is research out there. You can click this link to Google Scholar and find a ton of papers. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?...oxicity+of+Nitrate+to+freshwater+fishes&btnG=

You will see "About 33,200 results" so you may want to limit that to more recent papers by clicking on Custom range and entering beginning and ending years.
 
I always find threads like this interesting. Over 40+ years of fish keeping things we worry about & can test for have changed dramatically! A (long) history of our water & fish keeping. Always in my layman's terms.

When my husband was a college chemistry major, he wanted to know the pH required for our bettas to breed How many decimal places? Those poor fish, a rollercoaster ride! All available info was the very little of some vintage from collection sites. We were "hardcore" water changers, 10 or even 20%/month or so but no vacuuming. We did breed bettas once but couldn't raise them. Our CA & SA cichlids bred like crazy without pH experiments.

Then at our 1st house we went all into under gravel filters with HOBs too. We used Chemi Pure filter resins to clear the brownish water & sometime stinky water. It supposedly took out other water quality issues but no tests, no idea. We "aged" our tap water in gallon jugs all over the house. Then a brief oil smell to our ta, used a carbon filter for fish & drinking water. Tried our hand at plants, only a few java ferns & anubias lived. A guy down the street sold them in TFH magazine, how cool! Bred some other easy fish in rock hard water again! Joined a club & gave away a ton of java ferns!

We moved again & had soft water! A new thing, but sometimes seasonal water. We paid more attention to town water reports. I was a "stay at home" fish mom, water tester, TDS meter owner & weekly or more water changer. Nitrates were very low! More plants! I traded to lfs for fish or food. We also started looking at our local water reports, chemist husband anyway, lol. Nothing scary that he saw.

Now we live on the west coast. Still soft water but water is different here. He looks for selenium & some other issues. None so far, but we did have dead algae stink for a few weeks. Supposedly safe, amazingly it was fixed when a water board member had it at his house.

So (finally!), my nitrate "rule" since I've "regularly" tested is under 20ppm max if possible, 40 is iffy/ok, 80+ probably not so much. But like "old tank syndrome" slowly rising nitrates is easier for fish to adapt to that than a sudden guilt trip of giant water changes. It seems that fish naturally accustomed to very hard water are less affected by high nitrate but that may be a misconception on my part. With wild caught fish I think I'd try harder.

I can't help but relate fish tap water quality to human consumption. Of course, some people have no choice but to drink whatever they have available. & I doubt it will kill them (us?) outright but long term...ugh!
 
I should have also mentioned microplastics etc. as concerns among other stuff for both people & our fish. I don't have good answers for those either.
 
20ppm max if possible
I do not measure a lot, but i can see it, if it's to much. Water surface, algae, assimilation of the plants, fish behaviour. With a good sense for detail, it's possible to run tanks healthy and stable.

Another very important thing is (if not the most important) bullet proof biology, microorganisms, those good glitchy films on the glass and the stones, the good detritus (the one you can see a lot in biotope videos on Plants). All those are buffering factors, that prevent aquariums from going down.
 
Hey,

bullet proof biology

yup. Heavily depends on the fish, too, though.

F_Luxus knows this tank:

Moos.PNG

>1000 ppm nitrates. Out of spite. And because I wanted to be able to say I had a tank with 1 g/l nitrates.
No algae, Guppies didn't care, neither did "Nomnom" (My Ancistrus).

However, there are fish that won't take that level of nitrates. And as stated, it depends on the rest of the tank.

More often than not, our hobby doesn't have any hard limits or fixed set of rules. So I'd neither say "nitrates kill" nor "nitrates don't matter".
 
Hey,



yup. Heavily depends on the fish, too, though.

F_Luxus knows this tank:

View attachment 373988

>1000 ppm nitrates. Out of spite. And because I wanted to be able to say I had a tank with 1 g/l nitrates.
No algae, Guppies didn't care, neither did "Nomnom" (My Ancistrus).

However, there are fish that won't take that level of nitrates. And as stated, it depends on the rest of the tank.

More often than not, our hobby doesn't have any hard limits or fixed set of rules. So I'd neither say "nitrates kill" nor "nitrates don't matter".
How long has the tank had 1000ppm nitrates?

Let us know how they are doing after 6 months, 12 months, 2yrs, 3yrs, etc.

Short term it might not show much difference to the fish but long term (6 months plus and certainly into years) will either prove or disprove your theory and comments.
 
Hey,

tank doesn't exist anymore in that state, but was like that for a good 3 years or something. Total running time of the tank was 6 years. The guppys are still thriving in a new tank (or rather the offspring by now), less nitrates this time though. Simply for the reason that there is no reason for nitrates that high.

That tank originally started for the reason to disprove the "nitrates cause algae" myth.

Acclimatization might be the keyword here, as they were not suddenly faced with those levels, but in a slow process. We're talking years.

All of them were born in that tank, I've had them for well over 10 years now.
 

Most reactions

Back
Top