Hi B&K and welcome to the beginners section!
Jayne and Assaye are right, Fishless Cycling is much, much easier than Fish-In cycling because there is so much less water changing! For the bulk of the process there is little more than a few squirts of household liquid ammonia from a bottle you've bought into the tank using a graduated syringe and of course performing the same water chemistry tests you'd be doing for a fish-in cycle. There's no difference in the time it takes of course because the two species of bacteria we are growing are the same critters either way.
When we cycle with fish and they live all the way through, its not that they are "hardy" per se, but just that their gill scarring has not killed them but only shortened their life. When fish move water through their gills, the take in oxygen and give off both CO2 and ammonia. In nature, this ammonia is carried away by millions of gallons of fresh water but in our tanks it isn't. Fish waste, excess fish food and plant debris are all broken down (by heterotrophic bacteria which are not the ones we are trying to grow) into still more ammonia.
Ammonia, even in tiny amounts, causes permanent gill damage and is considered a major toxin to fish. The first of our two species of filter bacteria, Nitrosomonas spp., will break down ammonia into nitrite(NO2) thus moving the Nitrogen a step along the "Nitrogen Cycle." Unfortunately, nitrite(NO2) is also a deadly toxin to fish as even in tiny amounts it attaches to the hemoglobin protein on fish red blood cells and alters the protein such that it can no longer accept oxygen. This suffocates the fish, with the first symptom being permanent nerve and brain damage, leading to shortened life or death. Although there are thresholds below which fish will survive, there are not thresholds below which there is no harm.
Starting in 1980, a number of hobbyists who happened to also be scientists by profession, used their new found ease of discussion on the new "usenet" (prior to the web) to speculate about why we shouldn't be able to culture the right species of bacteria in a new filter simply by "simulating" the fish waste with simple pure ammonia. Over the following decade, the details were worked out by trial and error and the hobby began using the modern techinique of "fishless cycling." Its taking decades for the old methods to gradually be replaced by this new, and in my opinion, better, method.
Fishless cycling does not create a perfectly mature tank environment with all its natural cycles and complications in full swing. That takes a good six months to a year. What fishless cycling -does- accomplish is to grow a fully functioning "biofilter" to a testable level of robustness and maturity that can support a full stocking of fish per the "inch guideline" or can drop down to beautifully support any fraction of that level of bioload. I gives fish water that they can thrive in, right from the beginning.
The other wonderful thing of fishless cycling, at least here on the TFF beginner section, is that provides a perfect "incubator" for beginning hobbyists where they can learn hands on the core details about biofilters while at the same time having fun learning other beginning things and working on their stocking plan. The timing for watching the cycle turns out to be just about right for learning all the right questions about good stocking and other startup things.
Anyway,

, sorry to go on, I know you are not a beginner but I just thought an explanation of why we are very positive about our help process might be in order and might be helpful in explaining some of the responses you get.
~~waterdrop~~