t1tanrush
Fishaholic
Its just basic morals that humans are to be cared for first and foremost. We need to look after our own reace over a 12 cent goldfish. The wild populations of fish are fine, but choosing a fish that is abundant and easily available is not worth a human life.I must disagree with this, my last post in this topic however as it isn't at all fair on the OP.Your starving statement they are not near the same. A person's life is 100000X times more important than any animals life, period. This is just the way life should always work, however you extreme fish lovers " ZOMG MUST CARE FOR FISH NAO " feel the need to place an animals life as equal or more important than the lives of other people. You disgust me.
This if looked into ties in with your earlier quote;
Now i am certainly not the over zealous type but personally find the idea of any life being more important than any other fairly philisophical, you are obviously a humanist, but that doesn't make your opinion correct. Why does any life have to be more important than other? Human or otherwise?And everyones opinion holds equal weight.
I don't understand this, if you accept that cycle exists, then you accept that fish produce ammonia which is converted by nitrosomonas N.O.B resulting in nitrite....Nitrogen cycle may happen I don't disagree, however doing it before stocking a tank is NOT a fact, fish can do FINE without doing that.
Yes?
Then do you debate the fact that nitrite and ammonia are harmful to fish?
Could you explain accurately your view of, or better, your understanding of tank cycling?
Anyhow, i can see this deteriorating, and after having one topic locked today (sticking up for yourself->Here.)
I'll leave it at that.
Yes indeed it does exist, I accept they produce ammonia which is converted ETC. However the idea of " no fish in the tank " really isn't that big of a problem, the tank won't take long to cycle and the fish won't be exposed to such toxins for a long period of time. Not to mention the toxins are a lower quantity then an unfiltered tank or a tank that lacks religious water changes.
I'll go look at the other topic see why it was locked lol.
Why close this thread? Because it disagrees with your views on fish keeping?Don't bother with t1tanrush, it's been proved on other threads he's just looking to start an arguement. You say all people should have their own opinions and not bother other peoples, but you call us people who care for each life equally disgusting? If you dislike the forum so much, leave.
Close the thread already.
I stand up for all the people who think these standards are stupid. People like me get flamed and talked down to religiously if we do not accept the modern standards offered here. Like if someone offers advice and gets 2 peices of advice. 1 peice is what most believe and accept, the other is something out of the ordinary. The out of the ordinary one is labeled as bad advice, the person that takes the 2nd peace of advice is flamed for " if you don't want our advice don't ask for it ", and then told they only accepted what they wanted to hear.
I have been PMed before and thanked for being one of the few with the guts to say enough is enough. Yes I say all should have their own opinions, and they can express them, however the line is crossed when someone flames another because the person doesn't accept their opinion.
I don't dislike this forum, I dislike the "know-it-all" attitude a large portion of members display towards newbies to the hobby and the like.
