michaelwgroves
Fish Crazy
I think the Eheim Pro 3 2080 is the equivalent. I dont know if this is the review andywg is refering to, but this is one I read when researching the fx5 and it was under lab conditions.. http/www.discusforums.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=7080
NOISE
Both filters are quiet by modern standards but the Fluval is a lot noiser then the Eheim measuring out at 43db @ 1 meter vs the Eheims 19db !
The Fluval is quiet but the Eheim is so quiet you have to check it see if its working !
I read this article and it is a very good comparison, had me questioning if I purchased the correct filter. However, when you think about it, My FX5 is very quiet, okay the Ehiem is quiet'er, but at these levels I think it would be tough to notice the difference.
Okay you say, but the Eheim has better bilogical filtration, yep can't argue that, but the test was done during fishless cycling, okay you save 2 days on the Eheim.....but during a normal day your ammonia will never climb that high, so both filters are more than adequate for the biological filtration. Flow rate is better on FX5 and it's half price. Maybe the design is a bit noddy, but it's simple. I can't see that much can go wrong. The only moving part is the motor.
My money is on the FX5 everytime, if your concerned with reliability, simply buy a second FX5 with the money you saved on the Eheim.