Corrupt Test Kit!

reeeedfish

Fish Crazy
Joined
Aug 23, 2009
Messages
298
Reaction score
0
Points
0
I'm wondering if my API master freshwater test kit is wrong. I noticed that I leave the mixture of solutions and water in the tube untill I do my next test. Is it possible that the solutions are drying onto the test tube and skewing the results?
 
Yes! You should at least rinse the test tubes, but better still wash and dry them properly, with plain water and some tissue. The ammonia and nitrate tests especially stain the tubes if you leave them, though it will wipe out with a cotton bud or something like that.
 
+1 yes, clean the test tubes well after use, before storage.
 
I've tested 2 different API kits from 2 different sources. Both gave readings of 1mg/l of ammonia where there was none. API is mass produced cheap garbage IMO. Get yourself some Salifert test kits and enjoy the benefits of an accurate, reliable kit!
 
I wouldnt say its any more mass produced than Saliferts would you? My API kit is fine :)
 
+1 3 API every single one was inacurate when put against well pretty much any other kit minus strips. Utter Junk for the money
 
I wouldnt say its any more mass produced than Saliferts would you? My API kit is fine :)
I can find an API kit in any Walmart, Petsmart, Petco and every LFS I've visited in the surrounding cities here in my part of the U.S. Salifert can only be ordered online. An API "master" test kit costs $19 online whereas just the Salifert Ammonia kit costs $17. So, I would say it is flooding the U.S. market. I've tried them both and Salifert was the accurate kit.
 
Wow, thanks for the fast replies. The API shows the Nitrites inbetween 0 and .25 and the ammonia is just impossible to read. I'll get meself some saliferts now.
 
I wouldnt say its any more mass produced than Saliferts would you? My API kit is fine :)
I can find an API kit in any Walmart, Petsmart, Petco and every LFS I've visited in the surrounding cities here in my part of the U.S. Salifert can only be ordered online. An API "master" test kit costs $19 online whereas just the Salifert Ammonia kit costs $17. So, I would say it is flooding the U.S. market. I've tried them both and Salifert was the accurate kit.

Not to be overly pedantic, but how are you so sure one is more accurate than the other? Verified at an actual Chem lab? Otherwise, any test available for the hobbyist fishkeeper has at least +- 5% and more like +-10%.
 
I called the Dallas Municipal Water District and was told our tap water should not show any level of ammonia. 2 different API kits showed 1mg/l ammonia, Salifert read 0. The whole API kit costs almost the same as one Salifert ammonia kit. Is a Ferrari the same quality as a Chinese car? Have you ever paid less for superior quality? I have found you always get what you pay for. IMHO. No disrespect intended.
 
Does this test kit come in a master kit like api? I'm just trying to find it
 
+1 on the Saliferts, and for Bignose, I have done the testing, I used 3 sets of Saliferts from different baches, 3 sets of API kits from different batches and 3 sets of Nutrafin from different batches, the Saliferts came out on top every time, especially the nitrate test kits, whereby the reagents are dry powders, whereas the API and Nutrafin kits use liquid reagents, bottle number 2 is generally the bottle that contains the solutions that will separate, over the time, so unless you shake them really well you generally get inaccurate results, although it is inevitable that some of the solution will remain as sediment as I've found that it hardens over time. All of the kits were tested against electronic equipment, and known reference solutions.

Not sure about US pricing, but I've heard that Saliferts are pretty expensive over there, but here in the UK, you can get the Salifert kits you require (NH[sub]2[/sub], NO[sub]2[/sub][sup]-[/sup] and NO[sub]3[/sub][sup]-[/sup]) for about £16-18 in total, then you can use any PH indicator as most brands use a form of bromothyml blue, unless it is high range where by phenolsulfonphthalein is generally used.
 
+1 on the Saliferts, and for Bignose, I have done the testing, I used 3 sets of Saliferts from different baches, 3 sets of API kits from different batches and 3 sets of Nutrafin from different batches, the Saliferts came out on top every time, especially the nitrate test kits, whereby the reagents are dry powders, whereas the API and Nutrafin kits use liquid reagents, bottle number 2 is generally the bottle that contains the solutions that will separate, over the time, so unless you shake them really well you generally get inaccurate results, although it is inevitable that some of the solution will remain as sediment as I've found that it hardens over time. All of the kits were tested against electronic equipment, and known reference solutions.

Not sure about US pricing, but I've heard that Saliferts are pretty expensive over there, but here in the UK, you can get the Salifert kits you require (NH[sub]2[/sub], NO[sub]2[/sub][sup]-[/sup] and NO[sub]3[/sub][sup]-[/sup]) for about £16-18 in total, then you can use any PH indicator as most brands use a form of bromothyml blue, unless it is high range where by phenolsulfonphthalein is generally used.

You have some serious time on your hands!

BTW: Anyone seen The Wire episode where the mafia killer has all of the fish tanks? Forget his name...
 
All of the kits were tested against electronic equipment, and known reference solutions.

Just curious how you got access to reference solutions, and if you know how they were prepared?
 

Most reactions

Back
Top