Crossbred platies/swords look just like what they are - they may have small tail 'sword' extensions and are usualy slightly longer than a normal platy - resembling a 'variatus' platy IMO.
As for why I said breeding them is irresponsible - to an extent, yes it is just about letting hybrids get into the hobby. You see hybrid crosses don't actualy happen in the wild or at least don't survive (due to natural selection) if it were otherwise, you could find naturaly occuring platy/sword or molly/guppy hybrids which you cannot. The same applies to all sorts of african cichlids etc that will hybridize readily in captivity but which don't do so in the wild.
Allowing hybrids to escape into the wild (which often happens with fish distributed within the hobby - take people who flush fish for example) can cause very serious problems for the wild fish. Obviously this doesn't only apply to hybrids. For example, the released fish may out-compete local species, introduce disease into wild waterways and so on. They may become very successful in the new environment and breed like rabbits - taking over and causing serious problems for wild fish. If the fish also happen to be hybrids released into areas where either one of the 'parent' species lives, it may even contaminate wild gene pools. Hybrids introduced to the hobby can also actualy result in a depletion of wild populations - take african cichlids for example. There are plenty of ' assorted malawi' in most LFSs. Many, unfortunately, are hybrids. However, most fish-keepers don't want to buy 'assorted' fish (and rightly so) because they know they won't be able to predict their temperament or requirements. The result is that people look for specific, non-hybrid species (again, rightly so) and this now sometimes means taking the fish from the wild. The hybrids not only mean that you don't get the pure fish as easily, it also means that the pure fish available are few and therefore the captive gene pool is small - again necessiating the use of wild stock. The fact that many hybrids are sterile also means that the fry from certain fish cannot go on to breed so you, again, get a gene pool that is constantly decreasing in size. A dead end. In-breeding results and, after a few generations, may lead to deformities in fry, health problems, a weaker immune system and so on. Also, hybridizing fish has been used to an extent to produce new varieties in some of our common fish - take some of the fancy-tailed guppies for example that are endler/guppy crosses. Though 'domestic fancy' guppies are already as messed up as they can be so this hybridization doesn't realy cause as many problems for them, it has meant that Endler's are often not pure and hobbyists now are trying to stop keeping the two fish together so as to ensure that the captive population of Endler's still available is pure and the gene pool isn't becoming depleated. I know, BTW, that some people consider endler's and guppies the same species but I think there is now adequate information to at least make them sub-species (so resulting fry are still considered hybrids). Then there's the fact that many hybrid animals grow to be larger than either parent species (a non-fish example is a lion/tiger cross) or ends up with a completely different behaviour. Though this won't usualy apply to common livebearers, it does mean that offspring of some species may not be possible to look after properly if all you have to go on is the parents' temperament/requirements/adult size. There's plenty of other reasons hybrids shouldn't be circulated within the hobby but right now I can't type everything up. Realy though, I think what I've written here is enough to give you an idea of why I think breeding hybrids is irresponsible if you are not prepaired to then keep all the fry yourself.
Oh and, technicaly, most hybrids are not a new species as most won't breed true. Especialy if they are sterile in which case, obviously, they can't even breed in the first place
.