Came across this article on SeriouslyFish about recommended temperatures for fish and I have conflicting thoughts on it.
They make a very good points regarding the potentially flawed methods and timing of water temperature measurements in the wild, as well as temperature variability in the wild and the inconsistency in recommended temp ranges found online. However, I’m always a bit skeptical of the argument that if the fish “looks fine” and breeds, then it must be happy.
As always, I would love actual scientific longevity or stress studies on a variety of species kept at a variety of temperatures, or otherwise in-depth ecological studies that take seasonal temperatures and fish behavior into account. But those are both intensive and costly endeavors.
What are your thoughts on the argument(s) posed in this article?
www.seriouslyfish.com
They make a very good points regarding the potentially flawed methods and timing of water temperature measurements in the wild, as well as temperature variability in the wild and the inconsistency in recommended temp ranges found online. However, I’m always a bit skeptical of the argument that if the fish “looks fine” and breeds, then it must be happy.
As always, I would love actual scientific longevity or stress studies on a variety of species kept at a variety of temperatures, or otherwise in-depth ecological studies that take seasonal temperatures and fish behavior into account. But those are both intensive and costly endeavors.
What are your thoughts on the argument(s) posed in this article?