Miles_hot
Fish Addict
Hi there, I've just come across the idea of planted tanks and have read the "why we don't fishless cycle with plants" primer with interest. I've got a couple of general questions about planted tanks which I hope you can answer:
1) When you've planted the aquarium up with 75%+ coverage of the substrate how on earth do you see the fish? Looking at some of the (amazing) displays of greenery I struggle to work out how you'd see the fish
I assume that for some it is the verdant planting which is the attraction? Or am I worrying needlessly? 
2) I have assumed that we will want to build some sort of rocky backdrop with some ledges etc for plants but for the lack of cycling it seems that 75% is the minimum - given that a bunch of rocks will take up space I assume that this would have to be counted in the 25% bare ground? I'm guessing that ledges for plants etc will help offset this "cost"?
3) The fish-less cycle appears to rely on me being a surrogate fish and putting x drops of ammonia into the water (i.e. pretending to poo in the water for Y fish). Measurements are then taken to work out when the tank would be suitable for fish to take over the pooing role. As I understand it in a planted situation the tank becomes fish friendly very quickly (possibly instantly) however as a beginner would it make sense to take measurements to see the stabilisation happen? Would it be sensible to still to the surrogate fish bit with ammonia if I don't immediately start to stock so that the tank system "sees" fish or do they do something other than just excrete ammonia?
Many thanks
Miles
1) When you've planted the aquarium up with 75%+ coverage of the substrate how on earth do you see the fish? Looking at some of the (amazing) displays of greenery I struggle to work out how you'd see the fish
2) I have assumed that we will want to build some sort of rocky backdrop with some ledges etc for plants but for the lack of cycling it seems that 75% is the minimum - given that a bunch of rocks will take up space I assume that this would have to be counted in the 25% bare ground? I'm guessing that ledges for plants etc will help offset this "cost"?
3) The fish-less cycle appears to rely on me being a surrogate fish and putting x drops of ammonia into the water (i.e. pretending to poo in the water for Y fish). Measurements are then taken to work out when the tank would be suitable for fish to take over the pooing role. As I understand it in a planted situation the tank becomes fish friendly very quickly (possibly instantly) however as a beginner would it make sense to take measurements to see the stabilisation happen? Would it be sensible to still to the surrogate fish bit with ammonia if I don't immediately start to stock so that the tank system "sees" fish or do they do something other than just excrete ammonia?
Many thanks
Miles