@
gwand
So, let me understand what your are saying. You get 20 new fish- lets say a mix of one tetra and one danio species- which you put into a Q tank. They seem to be OK but the following day there is one dead tetra on the bottom of the tank which you remove. You see no symptoms and have no idea why it died. So, after you remove the dead fish you change 50% of the water?
The next day there is another dead tetra and a dead danio. But there are still no obvious symptoms. Some of the fish are hiding. But you still have no idea what killed those two fish either. So, I guess you take out the dead and change more water?
On day 3 you now have 4 more dead fish bringing the total losses to 7 of the 20 and still you see no symptom except the fish seem uninterested in eating for most of them.
But, you still have no idea what is killing the fish. My question is do you make you best guess as to what medication to try or do you let the remaining fish all die because you do not know what is killing them for sure?
I agree with those who do not medicate prophylactically. One should know what they are treating in order to know what is a good way to do so. But there are those times when fish are dying and we have no idea why. All we have is our best guess as to how to treat in order potentially to save the remaining fish.
When in this situation it would seem to me one's best guess at what medication to try is a better option than watching them all die.