Gaya, I watched some of those videos in your links (sig) and they are truly horrendous! Frighteningly sickening in fact. 
/www.petatv.com/tvpopup/video.asp?vi...r=wm&speed=_medand on a public street...exposing our children .How utterly pathetic.BettaMomma said:I have not read all these arguments back and forth, back and forth, etc.
Quite frankly I don't care either way why they do what they do, but they are complete radicalists who make me ABSOLUTELY FURIOUS. The only thing that I would ever use them for is to throw their name around so that the folks I'm trying to accomplish something (animal mistreatment-wise) will take me seriously.
PETA outright disgusts me. For instance... take a peek at this video...
http
Be warned, it is rather disturbing and shows dead, skinned animals.
They're using dead, skinned animals in a protest to have people not kill and skin animals. DEAD, SKINNED ANIMALS. Does this make any freakin' sense?
They make me so mad my heart pumps and I shake.
Believe me, if I could start some sort of organization that would pick up as much steam as their psychotic network has, I would - and I would make it an ethical, safe haven for any animal - ANY animal. I'd have networks world-wide and every single animal on this earth that needed help would be given the chance to live out a normal life in as close to their natural environment as possible. Unfortunately, there just isn't any hope for something like that any time soon, so I'll just keep trying to do my best and drag more sickly bettas home when I can. We can't save them all, but we sure do make a diff to the ones we do save.
It is completely disturbing.BlueIce said:
/www.furisdead.com/feat-momfur.asp ). As a little kid, that would have traumatized me horrendously, I've no doubt giving me nightmares for years and wondering if I could trust Mom or might she do something violent to my pets or maybe even to me! I cannot support or condone any agency that stoops to these means, no matter what "good" they bring about.Are you kidding? When you were in college doing research or when you did your dissertation or what ever, didn’t you need to defend it like the rest of us or did you have some special privileges or something? Having intelligent conversation and/or debate about a subject encompasses thoughtful resources. If you think your organization is a well thought out resource and you support what they stand for then how can you complain about child abuse when you support child abuse yourself? Your source commits grievous acts towards children and has been for many years. I don’t think you know that and I don’t think you would support it. So how can you know if it’s a reliable source if you know nothing of it? Though I’m starting to think that you just want to argue and you really don’t care what they stand for.BlueIce said:
While that is very disturbing and is not a good way to tell kids about the horrible things that go on in some fur industries, this is not why this thread was made. It was made to tell others how horrible it is that PETA has to euthanize animals. I've already made my point on this, any shelter that is not a no-kill shelter has to do that. The only reason PETA gets so much publicity over this is because it's PETA. People think that since it's PETA, they are supposed to save every single animal that they come in contact with. But like I said, I'm sure if it was a no-kill shelter people would be complaining because they wont accept the animals people bring in when they come to their limit.Haiku said:I was looking at the brochure they give to little kids (published on their own site http
I find it VERY disburbing anyway, and I'm a 30-year-old adult.
)
