SuperColey1
Planted Section
Yes that is exactly what we are saying. If the light is right then it is nutrient (C is a nutrient in essence.)
this thread is just discussing what makes the light 'right' as in does it need to be so high if everything else is OK. Do we assume that we need more light when something fails, then double the nutrient to go with the upgrade and then see the results of the nutrient and say 'It was the upgrade'???
My experiment goes the other way. It says I am not going to upgrade the lights at all. I will stick with 0.9WPG (=1.8WPG.IMO) but I will double the nutrient.
AC
this thread is just discussing what makes the light 'right' as in does it need to be so high if everything else is OK. Do we assume that we need more light when something fails, then double the nutrient to go with the upgrade and then see the results of the nutrient and say 'It was the upgrade'???
My experiment goes the other way. It says I am not going to upgrade the lights at all. I will stick with 0.9WPG (=1.8WPG.IMO) but I will double the nutrient.
AC