Minimum Tank Size For A Single Male?

Spishkey

Spishkeys Turtle Rescue
Joined
Jun 20, 2008
Messages
2,000
Reaction score
0
Location
Belgium
ive never kept bettas but was so tempted at the weekend, i saw a reddy/blued body one with bluey/purple long spindly (not torn) fins oh my god he was gorgeous; never seen anything so pretty in my life, but the shop was so busy i left.

now i have two small aquariums here which ive never done anything with and was wondering would one be suitable for a male betta? and what would i need to keep a group of females (i believe you have to have a group of 5 +?)
one is
48x 27 x 27 cm (35 litres) and the other is 30/15/20 (9 litres, currently being used as a hatchery)
 
9 litres is too small.

35 litres would be fine for a single male, i've kept mine in 25-30 litres and they've loved every minute of it.

i would say 35 litres is verging on too small for a female sonority though. (obviously females can never be kept with males). they really need 40 litres plus for a group of 5 or more, with plenty of hiding places and refuges. spawn sisters will get on better than a bunch of strangers.
 
is 5 the minimum you can keep together of females?

looks like i have a use for the 35 litre tank then. may have to get it up and running with mature filter media and see if that pretty boy is still there at the weekend though i doubt it as he was soooooo beautiful!
 
the 35 would be ideal for a male, but i'd advice bigger for females, 5 is the reccomended minimum, but the ore you have generally the less aggression
 
ive never kept bettas but was so tempted at the weekend, i saw a reddy/blued body one with bluey/purple long spindly (not torn) fins oh my god he was gorgeous; never seen anything so pretty in my life, but the shop was so busy i left.

now i have two small aquariums here which ive never done anything with and was wondering would one be suitable for a male betta? and what would i need to keep a group of females (i believe you have to have a group of 5 +?)
one is
48x 27 x 27 cm (35 litres) and the other is 30/15/20 (9 litres, currently being used as a hatchery)

Sounds like a Crowntail - now you're doomed to a life of 'Just one more'...
And I totally, if unneccessarily, third the others - go for the larger tank.
 
9 litres is too small.

i disagree. 9L = 2.378 US Gal which is an acceptable size for a single betta. recommended minimum is 1 Gal and while i would not personally keep one in a tank that small i think that almost 2.5 Gal is perfectly acceptable provided it is heated and water changed regularly enough.

yes he would probably love the larger tank, but that doesn't mean he wouldn't be happy in the smaller one.

35L = 9.25 US Gal and lots of people on this forum keep small sororities in 10 gal (and smaller) tanks. it might work for you, it might not. if you did decide to do it, if you can get sibling females they are more likely to get along together.
 
oooh so i could put a male in the 9L and females in the 35L.


oh god so many options. this is going to become addictive isn't it?



no i must refrain, i shall get a single male for now. still not sure which to put him in!
 
I definitely agree with ibble.

The ~2.5 gallon is great for a single betta if you do your water changes appropriately.

The 9.25 gallon is perhaps a bit small for a female sorority. If you have enough live plants and other places for females to hide (caves, rocks, etc) then you could probably house 5 to 6 females. You're correct that females are best with 5+ in a sorority :)

-ezrock-
 
the 2.5 would be ok for the male, if you can filter and heat it properly. the 9 would be ok for a group of 5-6 females, but it has to be well filtered, heated, and very densely planted with lots of caves, logs and hiding places.
 
I think the main thing is that you provide enough swimming space and areas to explore. Its people who keep bettas in cups and jars that are the main problem. Some shops tell you that because they breathe air and have long fins they are fine in a cup they will survive in a cup but definately wont be happy. The main thing is finding a tank that your betta can swim in and enjoy at least your clued up enough to know not to restrict him into a tiny tub! there are plenty of people here with good advice when your starting up but you've avoided the main no no!
 
oh also, if you have plastic plants...and even some silk ones and ornaments and caves, run a pair of old stockings over them, if the plastic snags the stocking it will rip a bettas long fine fins to shreads.
 
Don't know if the idea appeals to Spishkey or not, but I've got two little 'emergency' tanks (picked up at garage sales by my mother) done up as Walstads, with the gravel-capped soil-based plant filtration system.
And small tanks increase concerns in many aspects, not least because ammonia/nitrite levels can build so rapidly in such limited quantities of water.

For a general overview:

http://thegab.org/Articles/WalstadTank.html

...In her book, Ecology of the Planted Aquarium: A Practical Manual and Scientific Treatise for the Home Aquarist, Diana Walstad says the goal is to set up an ecosystem where "plants and fish balance each other's needs". In this type of tank, the plants are the water purifiers rather than the usual filters. Rather than converting ammonia to nitrAte, plants convert ammonia to plant mass, so there's no buildup of nitrate and pH doesn't drop over time. Plants also remove heavy metals from the water. Fish food, mulm and micronutrients from the soil feed the plants. Fish and bacteria produce carbon dioxide for the plants and the plants help produce oxygen for the fish. Only moderate lighting combined with sunlight is needed. A Walstad-type natural planted tank is low maintenance requiring only pruning of plants and infrequent partial water changes. ...

http://thegab.org/Articles/WalstadTankDemo.html

'Step by Step: Setting up a Walstad-Type Natural Planted Tank
By Betty'

(Some of the updates which may not have been added here - airing [or 'mineralizing' via soaking, on another thread] soil which has been sealed up, prior to use, reduces ammonia release which is a problem in some soils, enabling often immediate fish addition and reducing prospective algae problems.
Ensuring that the soil is covered with gravel where it would be exposed to sun or other strong light through the glass prevents additional iron release from the soil, which, like apparently everything else, affects algae growth.
Diana Walstad does now recommend water circulation, although many, especially in small tanks, do well without.)
And small snails are essential to the system.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HLKaLXnMYyY...feature=related

'Our natural planted (Walstad style- low tech) tank for our betta'

Whole big thread below:
http://www.aquaticplantcentral.com/forumap...on-hex-npt.html

Cheap, easy, and healthy for your fish.
Of course, some of us still have our Walstads on weekly rotation for waterchanges, even though it screws up the system, because we're big, chronically damp, chickens...
 
wow syphoneria, that really does appeal to me actually, just a couple of days back i asked in TD section about info on the subject.
http://www.fishforums.net/content/Tropical...nyone-Got-One-/


with the added info youve gave i am even more determined to try it!

thank you so much!

what i havent came across yet though, is there any particular plants which are better than others for this?

i have tons and tons of ancharis (sp) which i could use, its nice and soft
also have duck (pond weed) do floating plants contribute to the system or is it just planted plants?
 
wow syphoneria, that really does appeal to me actually, just a couple of days back i asked in TD section about info on the subject.
[URL="http://www.fishforums.net/content/Tropical...nyone-Got-One-/"]http://www.fishforums.net/content/Tropical...nyone-Got-One-/[/URL]


with the added info youve gave i am even more determined to try it!

thank you so much!

what i havent came across yet though, is there any particular plants which are better than others for this?

i have tons and tons of ancharis (sp) which i could use, its nice and soft
also have duck (pond weed) do floating plants contribute to the system or is it just planted plants?


By George, you've already got it!
Floating plants are highly important - and duckweed is a wonderful ammonia sucker ( the tiny duckweed variant that came with my shrimp grew roots a good inch long) - and emergents (having a heck of a time remembering which will grow emergent, though) as well, if you can get them.
I've seen a lot of discussions on these, though too lazy to dig for them right now, and, of course, some recommendations are on the sites posted earlier.
Anacharis should be absolutely perfect, though prob best to have a few other things, if poss.
I know Diane Walstad recommends the addition of as many different plants as possible, to see what will do well, as one never knows what may be great in one tank but expire in another.

Among the billions of things I know nothing about, plants get rather lost in the shuffle.
I can say what I've done, and hope you learn by my mistakes, because somebody ought to, and it evidently isn't going to be me, lol.

That first little 5 gal. I redid (waaay too thick substrate) seems to be OK although now has only rather a lot of Cardamine, one crypt, 4-leaf clover throughout, some floating Pennywort and a tuft of an aquatic grass I actually got from the same friend's country field spill-over ditch that my Central Mud Minnow came from.
The egeria densa I'd put in had starved early on, as I was too chicken to put a fish in for the first 6 weeks, and more recently I removed more plant mass than I wanted, taking out the unpotted Water Wisteria crowding the larger of the two crypts I'd put in (took the other one out to use elsewhere, as both had survived) and then realized I couldn't float any of the Wisteria to make this alteration more gradual as I'd block too much light.
So, between that reduction in plant mass, spilling earth on the gravel (I was going to cut the roots, but they just came up as I touched them - and it was the last of 5 small plants that carried up the dirt...) and doing a lot of extra, plant-starving water-changes getting some of that spilt earth off the top of the gravel, it did wind up with some algae, but it's happier now, and the fish (one 'feeder' guppy and a young male betta) have, most importantly, continued to do well.

So it seems that having only a few plant types can work fairly well, although it started off with more...

But I also had a snail shortage - and you need lots of small snails, Ramshorns being ideal as they'll eat even cyano bacteria and Malasian Trumpet Snails being highly important as they work through the substrate, like more attractive earthworms.
Figures, as I'd chucked so many snails arriving in plant purchases in the past and then more recently couldn't even get a inadequate few pond snails for a long time.
If I didn't want them, nobody would eat the few snails and eggs I finally succeeded in getting, and I'd have thousands by now...

I'm sure you have this URL, but in case it's handy:

http://www.aquaticplantcentral.com/forumapc/el-natural/

I'm afraid the postings there lately seem to be of people doing cross-over/mixed/experimental methods, but I, at least, had a great time over months going through old posts and links, and the stickies have some of the most essential info.

Started looking for some of the pertinent posts, but, duh, you'll be doing that...

My memory seems to be missing of late, (think it eloped with my brain) so, keeping a salt-shaker handy, and bearing in mind that whatever I do may well cause the informed Walstad person to run screaming:

A fair number of the initial plants should be fast growers, as you know, and the sturdier the better, with a variety of stem plants recommended.
But of course fast growing standards like Water Wisteria and Water Sprite will rapidly take over a whole earth-nourished tank, and it's not so easy removing plants from a soil-based substrate without releasing earth onto the gravel where the wild algae will roam - or yanking up the entire bottom with a well-rooted plant - so if you use them, and if there's any way of potting/blocking them when you set up, to restrain the roots and allow other plants to survive, that's a good thing to do.

I'm financially challenged and tend to make do a lot, and in the 15 gal. I last set up, I mended a broken low, longish, oval china serving-type dish with aquarium glue, (and after several days hardening time, got the layer of moistened earth into the bottom, and covered with the wetted gravel I was using,) in which to plant the Wisteria I added, and placed that directly on the tank bottom.

Since it was then hidden by the (wetted) gravel covering the (dampened) earth on the rest of the tank bottom, (with a small rising hill and some rocks required,) it didn't matter what the aquarium-safe container looked like, but the Wisteria roots and shoots hopefully now won't be able to choke out smaller or slower-growing plants.

And I wish I'd had something small enough to do that in the little tanks...

Things like Pennywort - which can grow both from the ground or floating - are good, various hygro varieties, some people have had great success with different rotala varieties, think indica was one...

So much depends on light, too, although that's another thing I know nothing about. (I'm well-rounded that way.)

Being among the broke/cheap, I get second-hand incandescent canopies and use CF bulbs.
My parents got me a nice 25 gal. kit. a few years back (paid a fortune, and could have got something excellent second-hand for the cost, but what a lovely surprise) with a useless 20 watt (I ask you!) flourescent hood light - you'll laugh, but I got a used 10 gal. incandescent hood and CF bulbs, and switch it from one side to the other through the day - prior to that, it was sharing for a while with a 15 gal. across the room.
Wanted to do the shop- or architect light thing, but haven't managed that yet.
Don't know what your financial state is, but for those of us whose wealth flows into fish food and meds, a lot of jury-rigging is required.
And this might be helpful to someone else - the ranks of the impoverished grow annually.

I don't know what'll suit you, but nearly all of my tanks, even the tiny ones, have a flat rock or piece of slate somewhere handy up front on which to feed and pour water over without (hopefully) uprooting anything or, Heaven forfend, disrupting earth into the water column.

With one 10 gal., (not a Walstad but with a very light-weight, messy, enriched substrate,) I just pour water from jugs into the back of the HOB, but in my case, as I still have tendon problems up to the elbows in both arms, it ain't fun or, always, very controllable.
But that might be preferable for some.

It's recommended to work out your hardscape first, and I just put gravel under things like that, in avoiding compressing earth under objects where it won't be oxygenated by roots.

Of course, mine work out more as semi-Walstads, between a thin layer of (wet) gravel added first around the tank edges, so that the soil's not exposed through the sides to iron-releasing, algae-encouraging light, plus gravel under anywhere anything other than plants will go; large rocks, slate, a box filter in some - so some tanks have strips and sections of earth, rather than the proper wall-to-wall earth-bottomed Walstad.

But most people just put things on the bottom, and use a thinner layer of gravel.

And I always start off with specific plans that tend to last only as long as my arms do...

Being the chicken that I am, I always put a thickish (usually too-thick) layer of gravel over top to hold the dirt down as well as possible, as some of the people with thin layers do sometimes find soil's easily stirred up - but that's just what I'm doing to try to avoid some problems, which creates others, like less remaining water volume.

And if the earth is thoroughly moistened prior to being placed in the tank bottom, you'll get far fewer 'belches' from under the gravel - and (hopefully) won't get soil burped up all over your tank.

I didn't do this in the first one, and it bubbled for weeks...
No real problems, though - so far - in any Walstad.

Don't know if any of that helps, and any worth-while tips you've likely come across already, but I must say the Walstads seem to be less trouble, (read algae-prone, generally from plant-melt, like developing now with, according to my LFS's owner, no Flourish or suitable water-column ferts supposedly available anywhere in Western Canada??? :shout: ) than the inert gravel tanks - even though I'm perpetually fouling them up with nutrient-draining waterchanges and have no proper lighting systems at all.

And it's a very cool system, lots of fun.
 

Most reactions

Back
Top