Indeed is true. While I won't go down the route of dismissing the highlight myth in this thread so it doesn't turn into an argument

I would just say:
Plants+light is like a PC!!!
Buy a 486 oldy and you aren't going to be doing anything hi tec on it. Buy the latest super dooper model and you can do anything.
Now that is not to say you need the latest super dooper machine to do what you want. Indeed much like my lighting levels

I have a 6 year old PC with just a P4 processor single core in it. It does what I need and because I keep it super maintained it is a pretty reasonable speed. In fact much faster than some of my friends (unmaintained) quad cores which should blast mine out of the water
So what am I saying?
Add no light (cover the tank up) and the plants aren't going to grow. Use 0.5WPG of poor light then they will grow ultra slowly. Add a reasonable level (0.5WPG of good light to 2WPG of poor light) and you will have a slow but easy maintenance set up. Add the ultimate (2WPG good light+) and you will get super dooper speed of growth BUT you have to then upgrade the other components. CO2, flow, etc Just as you can't just get a super fast processor and expect it to work without adding sufficient memory, graphics card etc to cope with the new capability.
In short there is no easy answer to your setup. I would start low, get easy plants growing, learn the hobby and get your system in balance so that you don't struggle with algae or plant death and then decide if turbo growth and constant pruning is your goal
Virtually all plants will 'grow' under any light and without CO2. The difference is that they may grow differently. i.e. HC growing leggy under low light and carpeting under highlight. Whether it is the light or the increased CO2 injection that comes with highlight that causes the difference I will leave with you people to decide for yourselves
I am one of the few that theorises that itis the CO2 and not the light that is the factor here
Plant up and enjoy
AC