ArauraDiscus
Fish Addict
ok, but thats considering you don't add anything to it at all and use pure ro water and let it sit by itsef for days... Thats an ambigious expectation.
I'd be surprised if anyone really bothers. From what I can gather the theoretical "pure" water value is actually incorrect as pure water contains nothing to measure with and in order to read what the pH involves introducing some of what will be measured, so it is no longer pure. Secondly, it seems that the value is derived by theoretical maths, rather than by actual measurement.Well, whether it is 7.0 or 6.998, it definitely isn't 4 or 5![]()
It takes some pretty beefy equipment to get a reading to 3 significant figures, all the stuff I've ever used in the lab only reports tenths, and those probes were usually at least a hundred dollars. I can only imagine how expensive a probe that measures thousandths must be.
Read the talk page on the wiki pH page, that's where I am getting most of my info from. However, I am not disputing whether water has a neutral pH (which it appears is 6.998), I am stating what I have read regarding whether pure water has any pH at all. what I found was:Those are just andys opinions, I've yet to see his proof.
Water is the universal solvent, therefore it must have the potential to have a nuetral Ph and not only does it have the potential, it very often reaches a neutral Ph.
Pure water contains no hydrogen ions (or any ions at all as no dissociation takes place. By strict definition, pure water cannot have a pH value. It is not even posible to measure the pH of pure water, because, as I noted above, the measurement process itself introduces all of the measurable ions, completely invalidating any result.
Water does inherently dissociate. Pure water, under 'standard' conditions, dissociates from H2O into hydrated H+ and OH- to the extent of 1x10-7 moles/liter, also called pH 7 or neutral pH, the pH where there is no excess of acid (H+) or base (OH-).