Vin Swords
Fishaholic
In reading about planted aquariums and whatnot, and the issue of needing to artificially introduce CO2 into an aquarium, I came to wonder where exactly plants in the wild get their CO2.
I understand why we need to introduce fertilizers into the tank. The soil that plants thrive in contains nutrients that have only come to exist in said soil from centuries of organic decay (we have a poster in the plant science lab that shows a time line showing the major events that occurred in the amount of time it took 1 inch of soil to be "created" - it spans something like 600+ years).
But why do we need to add CO2? Our need to add CO2 means there must be some source in the natural environment that we cannot provide in an artificial environment. It can't be the fish in the plants' natural environment because, well, we keep fish in the tanks. One must assume that the stock of fish in the natural environment is at a level at or below what most of us keep in our tank. So where are the plants getting all this extra CO2?
Just curious.
and do u have planted tanks without co2 or carbon dose?
I understand why we need to introduce fertilizers into the tank. The soil that plants thrive in contains nutrients that have only come to exist in said soil from centuries of organic decay (we have a poster in the plant science lab that shows a time line showing the major events that occurred in the amount of time it took 1 inch of soil to be "created" - it spans something like 600+ years).
But why do we need to add CO2? Our need to add CO2 means there must be some source in the natural environment that we cannot provide in an artificial environment. It can't be the fish in the plants' natural environment because, well, we keep fish in the tanks. One must assume that the stock of fish in the natural environment is at a level at or below what most of us keep in our tank. So where are the plants getting all this extra CO2?
Just curious.
and do u have planted tanks without co2 or carbon dose?