So, i am yet to decide how i am going to heat my aquariums in my fish room. I am an engineer, so technical thinking is not a problem, but 'wattage' and 'power' is way out a structural engineers remit, so i am stuck!
The rule with aquarium heaters is 1 watt pet L. Lets say i have 10x 100L tanks (for ease of calculation). I would need a total of 1k watt of aquarium heaters. I would then hope the heat escape would heat the rest of the fish room too.
The other option is to heat the actual room. So i could get a heater and heat the room to the temp the fish need (say 24 degrees). Granted it would take a long time to heat the water, but once its up to temp, no problem.
Difference is that water holds heat much better than air does..... so MAYBE i would need a bigger heater if i were to heat the room. But, for arguments sake, lets say i don't.
So, the question is, do i need the same amount of wattage to heat the room as i would the aquariums?
The answer seems obvious, but it gets more complicated.
I was ready to shove in a 5kW heater into the room and off we go. BUt a friend who used to run breeding rooms for aquariums in Scotland swears by a different type of heater - Thermetubes
There are only around 200-300 watts. He reckons he runs all his fish rooms off two of these, so a total of about 600W and a cost of less than 80p a day! He said that they are much better as they are lower wattage/lower cost.
BUT, i don't understand! These things are not thermostatic, so they are on 24/7. So running cost is simple to calculate. But, if i put in a 5kw heater rather than these, it will be thermostatic, so won't be on all the time. So if it were on for a total of 5 hours a day, its 5hours x 5kw.
I guess my question is, what is cheapest?! Will a 5kw heater thats thermostatic use the same/more/less power to heat a room as one of therse 200w heaters? Assuming the end result for a room will be a constant temp.
There is a benefit in having the room heater - no cost of multiple aquarium heaters and no worry about them failing (which i have had a lot more than room electric oil filled room heaters!!).
The rule with aquarium heaters is 1 watt pet L. Lets say i have 10x 100L tanks (for ease of calculation). I would need a total of 1k watt of aquarium heaters. I would then hope the heat escape would heat the rest of the fish room too.
The other option is to heat the actual room. So i could get a heater and heat the room to the temp the fish need (say 24 degrees). Granted it would take a long time to heat the water, but once its up to temp, no problem.
Difference is that water holds heat much better than air does..... so MAYBE i would need a bigger heater if i were to heat the room. But, for arguments sake, lets say i don't.
So, the question is, do i need the same amount of wattage to heat the room as i would the aquariums?
The answer seems obvious, but it gets more complicated.
I was ready to shove in a 5kW heater into the room and off we go. BUt a friend who used to run breeding rooms for aquariums in Scotland swears by a different type of heater - Thermetubes
There are only around 200-300 watts. He reckons he runs all his fish rooms off two of these, so a total of about 600W and a cost of less than 80p a day! He said that they are much better as they are lower wattage/lower cost.
BUT, i don't understand! These things are not thermostatic, so they are on 24/7. So running cost is simple to calculate. But, if i put in a 5kw heater rather than these, it will be thermostatic, so won't be on all the time. So if it were on for a total of 5 hours a day, its 5hours x 5kw.
I guess my question is, what is cheapest?! Will a 5kw heater thats thermostatic use the same/more/less power to heat a room as one of therse 200w heaters? Assuming the end result for a room will be a constant temp.
There is a benefit in having the room heater - no cost of multiple aquarium heaters and no worry about them failing (which i have had a lot more than room electric oil filled room heaters!!).