Glosso Question

[Daz CPFC]

Im considering having glosso in my nano tank but im wondering if it would carpet with DIY CO2 and around 3.0 WPG??

Or would HC be better?

Thanks.
Darren

 

[RadaR]

3WPG isnt seen to be alot in a nano. It could work but personally i wouldnt do it.
HC would definetly be better but if you really want to try the glosso then go for it.

 

[Daz CPFC]

3WPG isnt seen to be alot in a nano. It could work but personally i wouldnt do it.
HC would definetly be better but if you really want to try the glosso then go for it.

Oh right. WHats considered to be a good light level in a nano?

Thanks.

 

[RadaR]

Im not sure but i think it's 6.

 

[Daz CPFC]

OK thanks

 

[jimbooo]

personally i'd try it. if you have good substrate and plant loads of individual plantlets then it should work. i have no experience with HC so cant comment.

it may work / may not but you'll learn something along the way so give it a go.

 

[Daz CPFC]

personally i'd try it. if you have good substrate and plant loads of individual plantlets then it should work. i have no experience with HC so cant comment.

it may work / may not but you'll learn something along the way so give it a go.

I think i will once i have the extra light fitting in place il purchase it and let you guys know of my results

 

[SNAIL]

You'll be fine with either glosso or HC.
I have grown HC in a 3Gal tank in the past and currently have HC.
Only issue you will encounter with glosso is that it will over run your tank
once it gets going thus the reason for me switching to HC.
I have 3.25 wats per gal on my 3 gal tank and all seems well.