Don't want to throw a damper on a party, but...
When animals receive a name in a scientific paper, this is merely an opinion. Creating a scientific name doesn't "do" anything to the species, and it is entirely possible that another group of scientists will find reasons to squash the name, turning it into a junior synonym. Whether the name is widely used by other scientists is the real test.
My scientific training is as a taxonomist, specifically, of ammonites, and I have described at least half a dozen species of ammonite as well as created a couple of genera. Some of my names have been used, others have not. All names rise or fall on this "use" test, and you'd better believe that there will scientists out there looking to sqash the Endler guppy species name. There will arguments over the methods used, the partiality of the samples of regular guppies that the comparisons were made with, and so on.
It's also worth recalling that species mean more to humans than they do to Nature. All animal species are interrelated, and the species boundaries placed in between them are artifical constructs that exist to make life quanitifable and classfiable. The very fact that Endlers and guppies interbreed so readily reinforces this point, that whatever we call an Endler, from the point of view of a guppy, it's close enough to be seen as a potential mate.
Cheers,
Neale