Blondielovesfish
Kia Ora
draxis said:
They were not intended to be a financial gain. If youre going to name countries name one that doesnt abuse chickens and create bird flu panics throughout the nation.I wish that humans were not so selfish a as to have to mutate and warp a fish for their own grotesque financial benefits. Thankfully they're banned in Australia.![]()
Hate to say it but you have organizations with over $100k/yr funding due to your countries animal cruetly problems.
No one murdered the fish here or put them in toxic bath.
Ask these guys why.TallTree01 said:I'm not sure entirely what they're used to test but I've heard toxins and radiation in waterways. Surely there is a more humane way to test for these than using live animals.![]()
http/www.animalsaustralia.org/issues/animal_experimentation.php
More than six million animals are used annually in research and teaching in Australia and New Zealand. Many (but not all) those animals are subjected to some degree of pain and/or stress during the experimental procedure or as a result of the environment in which they are kept prior to and/or after the procedures. Australia does not yet publish national animal research and teaching statistics, but most States now gather them and publish them separately. See the statistics at Humane Research Australia.
A countries view on Animal Testing has nothing to do with an individuals.
Yes, New Zealand and Australia do (unfortunately) animal test. Do I or TT support it? No!
But, America animal tests too. Just because your country animal tests, doesn't mean you support it, does it?
And, at least organisations in Australia and New Zealand are trying to stop it. You said so yourself...
Hate to say it but you have organizations with over $100k/yr funding due to your countries animal cruetly problems.
/www.animalsaustralia.org/issues/animal_experimentation.php