I concur with most of what has been mentioned. Many Corydoras species are more likely to hybridise in the artificial confines of an aquarium. Species that would never even meet in their respective habitats, when forced into close confinement, may react differently from what one might expect.
While phylogenetically it now seems that there are nine distinct lineages within the "genus" Corydoras, meaning nine different but related genera--and most will maintain that fish will not hybridise across genera--the lineages in this family (Corydoradinae) are obviously very closely related. The three "Brochis" species for example are now within the genus Corydoras, because they share a lineage with two (going from memory, think it is two) other Corydoras species and are not distinct on their own, in spite of their external physical differences.
I am not aware that the "laser" types have been described as distinct species. They still retain the "C" number without a scientific taxonomy. Ian Fuller has written that there are differences in the fry, suggesting distinct species, but again I am not aware that this has been determined "officially" by ichthyologists describing the species and this has to occur. Corydoras aeneus has such an enormous range over the northern half of South America and onto the island of Trinidad that it is highly unlikely this is one distinct species, since these many populations are geographically isolated; though whether there are distinct species, subspecies, or geographical variants, I am not sure as to my knowledge this has not been sorted out. But if anyone has such data, I would welcome a link.
Byron.