Just a question I've pondered for a while but never thought to post. I don't mean to offend anyone, I'm just curious.
Why is it recommended that for zebra danios or rummy nose, that a three foot tank should be the minimum. These fish are only 2" long, admittedly they are active. In contrast, for a 1 foot fish like an oscar, a 6 foot tank is considered 'adequate.
I'm not questioning people keeping larger fish, but the comparable area that the larger fish has is much smaller, in terms of length, height and depth than for smaller ones. I'm just wondering what the reasoning behind this is?
Why is it recommended that for zebra danios or rummy nose, that a three foot tank should be the minimum. These fish are only 2" long, admittedly they are active. In contrast, for a 1 foot fish like an oscar, a 6 foot tank is considered 'adequate.
I'm not questioning people keeping larger fish, but the comparable area that the larger fish has is much smaller, in terms of length, height and depth than for smaller ones. I'm just wondering what the reasoning behind this is?