Just came across this article, very interesting stuff, part of it and the full article below:
http
/www.seriouslyfish.com/stunted-growth-means-stunted-lives/
We’re not so sure, and reckon ‘big’ fishes are often exposed to conditions or practises that could be considered stressors, and some of them may not be immediately obvious. These include:
http
/www.seriouslyfish.com/stunted-growth-means-stunted-lives/We’re not so sure, and reckon ‘big’ fishes are often exposed to conditions or practises that could be considered stressors, and some of them may not be immediately obvious. These include:
- Hunger due to underfeeding, inappropriate feeding regime, competitive behaviour due to the presence of dominant individuals, or insufficient knowledge of the aquarist regarding nutritional requirements of young ‘big’ fish.
- Malnutrition. Even if the diet is correctly-balanced nutritional deficiences can arise, especially in juveniles which naturally grow at a faster rate than adults. This is likely a major cause of stunting and associated skeletal deformities in aquarium ‘big’ fish, as is the use of ‘feeder’ goldfish in the diet of predatory species. We’ll be covering this in more detail soon.
- Fear and distress caused by presence of predatory or dominant fish, repeated handling, sudden changes in lighting, etc.
- Poor water quality and environmental conditions, in particular low dissolved oxygen, inappropriate or fluctuating pH, inappropriate temperature, high levels of carbon dioxide, excessive suspended solids, and high levels of nitrogenous waste products such as ammonia and nitrite. Another principle reason for stunting and poor growth in these species under captive conditions.
- Confinement stress and inability to swim in a natural way; this being especially acute in those ‘big’ fishes which are naturally migratory or move over long distances in nature. More on this in a future article.
- Over-stocking and/or over-crowding.
- Lack of environmental stimulation has not been well-studied in fishes, but may be more significant than is traditionally accepted (Southgate, 2010), especially in those maintained in completely bare set-ups.
