that is why i called the 1" rule a "rule of thumb," not an experts solid rule...and how can any guideline (i.e. 1 square inch of fish per..) be accurate without taking into consideration bioload? i think THAT "rule" is outdated just as the 1 inch of fish per gallon guideline is...
most people on this forum have come to the conclusion that this is a good guideline to start from and increase the number of fish over time so that the tank can deal with the increased bioload appropriately ...obviously we take bioload into consideration thus exclude most tetras from this guideline/rule and it obviously changes when we are talking about cichlids and any high-waste producing fish - which is an understanding amongst those on the forum...
so the strict rule is 1 square inch of fish per gallon and everyone should follow that regardless of bioload? how exaclty do we measure square inches of our fish accurately, by the way?
nowhere did i say that cories grow to 6 inches...i actually misread it thought you had 2 plus one albino so that is my fault
) ...cories CAN reach 3-4 inches in size - i have seen it.
and yes female guppies really can get to 3-4" in length, i have also seen that lol...again, these were max sizes i listed so it was obviously overdone some...in general though, guppies do range within 2-3" (at least mine do)...
although you only disagreed with the fact that cories should be kept in at least 20 gallons, you said that you know people who keep them in 5 gallons IMPLYING that it must be OK...so what the tank is physically big enough, but does your square inches of fish per gallon take into account the quality of life for the fish?
it's easy to see that you have your own ideas, beliefs, and ways of doing things (obviously from previous fishkeeping experience), but you need to at least investigate the new practices before you discount them (as you have obviously done mentioning cycling, etc), even if you do not embrace them...
it is my belief, although it may seem outdated or incorrect to you for whatever personal reasons, that by offering to newbies the 1" of fish per gallon "rule of thumb" (aka guideline), that it is nearly impossible for them to severly overstock a tank. we should assume everyone is a newbie, which i do and offer them this advice...
fact is, it is easy to estimate the length of a fish (which in actuality should start from the base of the tail and go to the eyes - but i didnt state that) as opposed to guessing the square inches of the fish - which many would not be able to do easily, not to mention those who use metric
about the danios, they may not grow to 3-4 square inches but they are messy and do produce a lot of waste....
the suggestion i made were based partly on max size of fish when adult (i obviously never said you are overstocked now, i said you had the potential to be in the future), but based mostly on quality of life....many of us on the forum believe in schools of fish, and fact is, if you did increase the numbers so that you had proper schools, whether you follow the inches of fish per gallon or square inches of fish per gallon, you will be overstocked...
although you say you did not mean for me to take it personally, when you repeat others phrases in spite, it does turn personal...(not to mention if you are going to quote, at least use the whole statement - i said "
rule of thumb is 1" of fish per gallon" to be exact
As for your comment of "1 fish per gallon whether I like it or not", actually that is not the rule, whether you like it or not