Why by exceeding the limits will the tank fail?, the whole process of EI is by exceeding the level of nutrients the plants need and basically resetting the balance each week with big water change. so within that week if you overdosed even to level i suggested, it would be 0'ed out by the time the water change was made..... plants i thought would absorb everything that was needed and then what ever is surplus would stay within the water column untill removed.. hence the water change?.... so i don't understand how it would make the tank fail?
Water changes are not for resetting the nutrient levels, Water changes are there for removing organic matter, ammonia and algae spores.
This goes without saying... however by me saying it resets the levels i probably could have described it better..so... dilutes would be more appropriate.. yes?
sorry, I mean by going past the light intensity set when EI was calculated (6wpg), not the nutrient levels, should have been clearer.
The levels wouldn't go back to 0ppm either, if you remove 50% of the water, you remove 50% of the waters contents.
No but the levels would be halved from what left in the water column which could potentially be very little dependant on levels dosed... again something which i could have explained a little better.
Not the impression from info ive always read and led to believe which is 1ml per 10l.... this info was also confirmed in my earlier stages of plant keeping by Mr farmer himself (when inquiring about a lower light leveled tank).... so as you can see this isn't just a good level experienced from me but a level that was advised to me from a very well respected aquascaper
Well all I can say is when I first started I was told 1ml per 20l from the very same Mr. Farmer! I can dig out some old posts for you if you like, I'll have to PM you them though as they are on another forum.
Here are some on TFF, by other members aswell.
http
/www.fishforums.net/index.php?/topic/319337-tpn-recommended-dosage/page__view__findpost__p__2650421
http
/www.fishforums.net/index.php?/topic/333927-tpn-question/page__view__findpost__p__2773014
Little confused here and apologise if i have missed something that would make sense lol
5ml per 100l every day or every other day
This was one of the dosing amounts put forward by you in this first link, this equates to 2.5ml per 50l daily or every other day 2.5ml(1.25ml daily).
You've linked to threads in which you've advised the dosing be the same or similar to my methods, quick scan of them all and your it pretty much states it in most apart from 1 i think..... again i took this info initially from the first link.
http
/www.fishforums.net/index.php?/topic/273327-dosing-tpn/
And on that one I say I dose only 3ml on my 60l, not the 5ml I originally thought lol
These are the maximum uptake rates (based on a tank with no limiting factors):
Nitrate (NO3) 20ppm per week/ 2.85ppm day
Phosphate (PO4) 3ppm per week/ 0.43ppm day
Potassium (K) 30ppm per week/ 4.29ppm day
Magnesium (Mg) 10ppm per week/ 1.43ppm day
1ml per 10litres adds this (the figures in brackets are for 1ml per 20l):
DIY TPN+ (3)
5.9ppm NO3 (2.95ppm)
0.31ppm PO4(0.16ppm)
3.9ppm K (1.95ppm)
0.39ppm Mg (0.12ppm)
Now you may be thinking that only the Nitrate is supplied in surplus for my figures (in fact it is for yours too but lets ignore that), but lets go back to the fact that this was based on a tank with 6wpg T5 & 45ppm+ CO2 (no livestock were in the tank).
I had just under half the lighting the EI tank did, so we can make a reasonable assumption that the uptake rates were halved - in which case my figures would cover those uptake rates.
I have seen only few tanks with more than 3WPG+, most stick to around 2WPG, so that is why the 1ml per 20l, in theory, should cover the plants needs.
Considering the OP has 5x less light than the EI tank, I believe 1ml per 20l will be sufficient, if it isn't, then yes, I'm wrong, but I have never said you can't raise the dose, I just think its silly starting off that high.
But i guess there is just where my opinion differs.. I'm in the mind set of dosing higher initially to prevent the possible causes of plants lacking there nutrients rather than waiting and seeing if the plants are lacking nutrients and then acting upon it... the cost of a mix your making yourself really is so minute that an extra bit over the 'recommended' dosage isn't gonna break any sort of bankruptcy levels.... my advise for levels is just that... advise and not set in stone.
The point I'm trying to make is, I had over 2x as much light & CO2 injection over the OP, and I was dosing at less than (or possibly half) the levels you advised,
I never disagreed my levels were high, the info i gave was from my experience from dosing on a similar sized 50l tanks with small to large plant mass setups and the initial info that was given to me and that i have read throughout my time in keeping plants.
You may well have 20-30 links saying the dosage can be 1ml per 20l, however i could probably find just as many if not more that either say 1-2ml per 10l or from people that are dosing 10 ml on a 50l tank with excellent results. swings and roundabouts with no SET level as such.
Anyways a good well mannered deliberation of what works for one and what works for another can only be good for the OP to get a full perspective of how different people get different experiences from very obviously different methods
Absolutley, I'm just trying to save you money, but there of course there is no problem in you carrying on, but we'll have to agree to disagree
The cost of saving money is so small while making your own mix is to me so little it wouldn't really matter on that amount of overdosing.... however if i was to use branded TPN+ then yes maybe this advise given on here for the OP may have been a little more conservative.... but the OP has already stated he was going to mix his own.
info given to me from far more experienced people.
but a level that was advised to me from a very well respected aquascaper
Far more experienced? I have been keeping planted tanks for 4years+ now!
I may not be the best aquascaper, it isn't what interests me, but I do enjoy the science behind it much more, I think George is the opposite to me, if you want advice on aquascaping then go to George, but I bet I can at least match his knowledge in chemistry
The health of my plants isn't any worse off than his - just the composition lol
Sorry i think you misunderstood what i meant.... i meant more experienced than me.. not you ... i had no idea up to now how much experience you had and im not disagreeing how much you know on the scientific background of it.
Sorry if that came across wrong... my wording obviously isn't great lol..
Thanks, Aaron