andywg
Bored into leaving
I know most people are not into rugby, being as watching girls fall over is more interesting for the general chav population, but I thought I would post this Guardian article up as it is a good discussion on the safety (or not) of the scrum in Rugby Union.
A synopsis of the article follows for those to lazy for teh clicky:
As most people will be aware, a scrum can be bloody dangerous. Deaths used to occur, and only a year or so ago, despite making the front row positions specialist and allowing uncontested scrums, a promising young prop was left paralysed from the neck down when a practice scrum collapsed. So why are they allowed?
Well, James Bourke, a former Nottigham RFC doctor isn't sure they comply with the health and safety act due to the risk. He does forget just how many scrums take place without deaths.
He also hasn't looked at the figures. In Australia between 1997 and 2002 rugby accounted for 23 severe spinal injuries of which seven were scrum related. What does this tell us? It tells us that 16 of them came from outside the scrum, most likely the tackle area. Does he want to see that banned as well?
I personally don't think scrums should be banned, but then I am biased being as I am a prop in training. To me it is one of the fundamentals of the game. Remove scrums and you have pretty much created rugby league. Remove the tackles as well and the players might as well start wearing sarongs and receive training in how to fall over.
The dark days of throwing a winger in the scrum to stop losing a game are gone, both captains and the ref can instigate uncontested scrums at all levels if it is considered unsafe (including where the pitch is like the Sommes and a risk of drowning is present).
As I stated at the outset, it's of minority interest, but it is warming for me to see that the fat blokes' part of the game should stay for some time. And here's to my first competitive scrum where I found out just how much fun the front row is (despite being the club's smallest prop of recent times).
Andy
A synopsis of the article follows for those to lazy for teh clicky:
As most people will be aware, a scrum can be bloody dangerous. Deaths used to occur, and only a year or so ago, despite making the front row positions specialist and allowing uncontested scrums, a promising young prop was left paralysed from the neck down when a practice scrum collapsed. So why are they allowed?
Well, James Bourke, a former Nottigham RFC doctor isn't sure they comply with the health and safety act due to the risk. He does forget just how many scrums take place without deaths.
He also hasn't looked at the figures. In Australia between 1997 and 2002 rugby accounted for 23 severe spinal injuries of which seven were scrum related. What does this tell us? It tells us that 16 of them came from outside the scrum, most likely the tackle area. Does he want to see that banned as well?
I personally don't think scrums should be banned, but then I am biased being as I am a prop in training. To me it is one of the fundamentals of the game. Remove scrums and you have pretty much created rugby league. Remove the tackles as well and the players might as well start wearing sarongs and receive training in how to fall over.
The dark days of throwing a winger in the scrum to stop losing a game are gone, both captains and the ref can instigate uncontested scrums at all levels if it is considered unsafe (including where the pitch is like the Sommes and a risk of drowning is present).
As I stated at the outset, it's of minority interest, but it is warming for me to see that the fat blokes' part of the game should stay for some time. And here's to my first competitive scrum where I found out just how much fun the front row is (despite being the club's smallest prop of recent times).
Andy