Standard test kits are incredibly inaccurate and I don't really understand why anyone uses them!!!
I for sure don't. My eyes watching fish and plants tell me if the parameters are wrong.
.5ppm (if it were true) should be OK as it means that there is some P in the water. If the P gets too low you will see green spots developing on leaves (not string just like the green you get on the glass.)
If you don't have green spots on leaves or glass and the plants are growing healthily then stop testing.
Andy
Thanks Andy. It seems the test kit is ok actually, or at least my experiment of adding 10 drops did result in a change of colour within the tube - only it took some hours to react! A guy on plantedtank.net has done quite exstensive calibration tests on the nutrafin/hagen test kit, with good results, which helped rebuild some confidence with this testing lark.
Hopefully with experience I will get to the point where I can 'read' the plants sufficiently and understand what's going on without testing quite so much. Meanwhile I'm still testing fairly regurlarly to try to assess uptake as best as poss.
No no no!
The person who did that test had a sample of 1!
Statistics wise,
you cannot say anything about that test, other that particular kit that he had was within the parameters.
You must test and calibrate YOUR TEST kit, do not reply on a sample of 1!
Ever.........
You cannot come to any conclusion with that kind of smaple about general inferences to all Hagen Test kits.
There is a lot of variation in any sample.
So either calibrate the test kit, or just assume it's wrong/you simply do not really know.
Those are the only choices.
Unless you run a sample of say 20 to 30 Hagen PO4 test kits from around the world, some sit on the shelf for 3 years, some the next week etc...let's assume no poor user errors etc.
Then you might be able to say with 95% confidence levels what the errors are or are not with the test kit/method.
That would take too long and cost too much, so simply calibrating each time is wiser.
2 test vs 20-30.
Do not assume because one hobbyist had good luck with a brand of test kit, you will get so lucky.
Think about it like this: would you believe a polling with a smapling no# of one bias person?
Hope not.
Yet, that is what many like to argue.
You need to do more than one replicate for any test to be even remotely confident of the results and say much.
A polling of say 1000 random folks might be wiser............
Or a random sampling of 50 Hagen test kits etc.........
See the differences?
As far as actual uptake, you need to do dry weight analysis of the tissues in the plant to really say much about PO4 uptake, after all..........some PO4 might buind to soil, preciptate out as FePO4, algae uptake, bacteria and fish waste, water changes can export these forms etc. So unless it's really active and rapid uptake, you will not see this too well unless you have pretty artificial and controlled conditions.
Regards,
Tom Barr