The confusing world of lighting.
IT really depends on the ballast. If it is an older style tar ballast, the results are iffy. Tar ballasts are heavy, produce more heat, and if you have a starter, require additional wiring. Not all tar ballasts use a starter, but starters are only used on this type of ballast.
Swiftly replacing these old dinosaurs are electronic ballasts. They are lighter, smaller, and produce much less heat. They are also more efficient, and easier to wire up.
What you are doing to your 18w tube on a 30w balast is known as overdriving, (OD), or overdriving normal output flourescent, (ODNO).
Overdriving wih an older style ballast prvides minimal benefit because the resistence of the 18w bulb to accept 30w of power creates more heat in the ballast therefore lowering its efficiency.
Electronic ballasts on the other hand, are far more efficient and will provide greater power to the bulb with less heat produced.
Many people have run bulbs with a ballast rated 4x greater than the bulb itself. The efficiecy is reported to still be in the 75% range et this level. This means that if you were to use a ballast designed to run 4x18w bulbs, and wired it to run just a single bulb, it would have a relative output of about 56 watts. Not bad eh?
Now in the real world, they don't make a 4x18w ballast that I am aware of. But take a 2x30w alectronic ballast, wire up a 18 watt bulb, and get an output realative to roughly 45-50 watts. Double up with another ballast and bulb, and end up with around 90 watts of light out of two 18 w bulbs. Not too shabby.
GL