Ok, so here's where I am at.
My current tank is a 60L tank, and using an aquatic flourescent tube. I'm not sure what it is, but it's one where you push on the end caps, and run a seperate 'lighting controller', which I think is just glorified transformer and starter. The tube itself is 15W. The hood it is mounted in is metal, and coated white on the inside, but there is no reflector on the tube.
My rough calcs give this as:
60L = 15.8 USG
15W / 15.8 USG = 0.94 WPG
My NEW 300L tank I thought came with twin T5 (2x 54W) lighting, however it seems I have some of the 'older stock'
which is equiped with T8 lighting (2x 30W).
The tubes in this are both 30W tubes, and both have silvered reflectors fitted.
My rough calcs give this as:
300L = 80 USG
60W / 80 USG = 0.75 WPG
Based on the fact that my new tank (see sig) is a 'tall' 4ft tank, does this mean that actually the new tank is worse off regarding lighting for plants than the old tank?
I do not have CO2 system on either tank, so I am wondering how these lighting levels compare for the sort of plants I will be able to have in a planted tank without CO2?
I'm actually really annoyed as I like live plants in my tank, and when I was researching the tanks I looked on Aqua Ones website and it said the tank came with T5's. It's only after having the tank fishless cycling for a month or so (with the lights off) that I now know the difference to look at T8s / T5s and realise I've actually got T8's
I've phoned Aqua One immediately and they told me that their older design had T8 and in the last year they moved to T5's, but thats not the point. For the £700 odd quid the tank cost me I didn't expect to get second rate 'older stock' 
My current tank is a 60L tank, and using an aquatic flourescent tube. I'm not sure what it is, but it's one where you push on the end caps, and run a seperate 'lighting controller', which I think is just glorified transformer and starter. The tube itself is 15W. The hood it is mounted in is metal, and coated white on the inside, but there is no reflector on the tube.
My rough calcs give this as:
60L = 15.8 USG
15W / 15.8 USG = 0.94 WPG
My NEW 300L tank I thought came with twin T5 (2x 54W) lighting, however it seems I have some of the 'older stock'

The tubes in this are both 30W tubes, and both have silvered reflectors fitted.
My rough calcs give this as:
300L = 80 USG
60W / 80 USG = 0.75 WPG
Based on the fact that my new tank (see sig) is a 'tall' 4ft tank, does this mean that actually the new tank is worse off regarding lighting for plants than the old tank?
I do not have CO2 system on either tank, so I am wondering how these lighting levels compare for the sort of plants I will be able to have in a planted tank without CO2?
I'm actually really annoyed as I like live plants in my tank, and when I was researching the tanks I looked on Aqua Ones website and it said the tank came with T5's. It's only after having the tank fishless cycling for a month or so (with the lights off) that I now know the difference to look at T8s / T5s and realise I've actually got T8's