How Do You Like My Sig?

[fish_keeper2]

i was just wondering what you guys think of my sig.

 

[jimbooo]

pic's great but the green wording messes with my eyes. also i think you've repeated "comes with" twice. or was that on purpose, if so you've lost me..

 

[fish_keeper2]

oops...thats a typo.....ill change it in a sec. how about changeing the text to a baby blue?

 

[trace1]

i love it, but agree bout the green writing lol.
maybe orange would look good to match the fish

 

[Lynz781]

I like the pic but I think its too big. I feel signatures should be smaller and longer or just have nothing. They are annoying and stick out too much and are distracting. Get in the way of the text. But it's a nice pic.

Oh and I agree the text should be darker, like orange to match the fish.

 

[TF Keeper UK]

Nice pic, change the size? The text colour is confusing! I'd change it!

 

[Bloo]

Nice piccies But agree the text needs to be a lot darker.
Perhaps the photo a bit smaller too

 

[Erised]

I love the picture, it's very sharp =) I'd like to add that even though people *prefer* longer and thinner signatures, yours is within the guidelines set for it, so if you don't want to change it you don't have to. I can imagine it would definatly give it a different look if you'd cut off the top of the picture or so to get it less high

Text wise, to be honest I didn't even realise there was text untill it got pointed out. A different colour might help it, I agree with the orange colour to match the fish. Or perhaps get the line of text in the picture itself rather than under it.

 

[Squid]

or both colours

" BEAUTY COMES WITH TIME BUT DISASTER COMES QUICKLY!!! "

 

[fish_keeper2]

i changed the text to orange, moved it above the pic and edited the pic. what do you guys think now?

btw this is the original pic:

 

[Squid]

I preferred the fuller picture

just my 2p though

Squid

 

[Bloo]

Me too actually

 

[lljdma06]

The picture is beautiful, though I like the original picture better. Now, I'm not a big fan of large signatures, they are distracting. I know people like to express themselves with them, but the larger ones are especially cumbersome. I will say, however, that at least yours, though large, would at least be pretty to look at.

Just my opinion.

 

[Jules H-T]

My personal view is that it's a bit harsh on people on dialup to have photos in sigs at all, but there we are. No arguing though, it is a lovely photo of a beautiful fish!

Not that it's for me to say, and I wouldn't were it not for the subject of the thread, a few people who've replied here could possibly refer to the sticky CFC put on signatures; only 3 people of 8 replies actually have sigs that meet the specification.

 

[jpedersen024]

I second the smaller pic (or no pic!) sentiment. Not that yours isn't beautiful and worth seeing....!!

Those pics are murder on those of us doomed to crappy dial up connections!!! 9 years later, I might be catching a glimpse of a fish eye... 9.5 years a fin...... etc etc. You get the drift.

Believe me, if something better were available, I would HAVE it. Such is the price for living in the beautiful boonies.