chishnfips
WHAT! You went over my Helmet!

Can anyone help me on this one. basically I want to know is it better to have carbon or not?
I have noticed the colouration of the water too, but would prefer it to be crystal clearddm18 said:Just to play devils advocate briefly:
1) Surely the beneficial bacteria can also grow on carbon, it's pretty small, so surely makes a pretty good biological filter...?
2) I use it sometimes and it definitely makes a difference in the clearness of the water. With carbon the water is crystal clear, without it it's a slight yellow-y colour (which is normal for mature water, I understand).
The reason I don't always use it (other than when I'm using meds) is because I'm indecisive to ridiculous proportions, and I sometimes decide that I prefer the more natural yellow-y colour, and sometimes I prefer my water crystal clear. As far as I can tell, the fish have never really noticed either way. I certainly haven't noticed any trends with illness/deaths etc.
I have a fluval 2, would that seachem fit into that filter, it sounds like it does the job well. Is it just like a piece of sponge or something.yvez9 said:Carbon just removes some particles from water, including meds.
it will clear up your water but it will only last a few weeks, after which you must replace it if you want the effects to go on.
I use Seachem Purigen myself. It removes a lot more particles than carbon without removing iron, which is necessary for plants to grow. Also, it lasts a good 6 months after which you need to dip it for a day in a bleach solution and then rinse it thoroughly and voila, it is regenerated.
It is a little expensive but my water has never been so clear, it's even clearer than tap water!